Corsair Dominator GT 8GB PC3-12800 CL8 kit

Test Setup & Overclocking

Test Setup

To ensure that all reviews on Overclock3D are fair, consistent and unbiased, a standard set of hardware and software is used whenever possible during the comparative testing of two or more products. The configuration used in this review can be seen below:
i7 Rig

CPU: Intel i7-870 @ 4GHz
Motherboard: MSI P55-GD80
Memory: 4x2GB Corsair Dominator GT PC3-12800 CAS 8-8-8-24
: Hitachi Deskstar 7k160 7200rpm 160GB
GPU: Asus GTX275
PSU: Gigabyte ODIN 1200w

Installing the kit was a relatively simple affair despite the cooler not having any assembly instructions. The blue tipped heatsinks on the Dominator GT kit are very fetching and will match any blue themed setup perfectly. Our test board, the MSI GD80-P55 is one such board.
without cooler with cooler
The bulk of the cooler presented a slight issue in that it blocked a third of the CPU cooler upon installation. To make matters worse, should you wish to orientate your CPU cooler in a horizontal position, the cooler would be unusable. The good news is that the 60mm fans are a great improvement over the previous 40mm variants. The cooler no longer whines like a women watching the football on TV, instead it just hums along pretty much silently, going about its business cooling the modules. You may read on some review sites that the cooler is loud. Upon first inspection I would have been inclined to agree but it is 'not the cooler that's loud, it's due to the cooler blocking airflow to the CPU HSF which gives the inclination that the Dominator cooler is making the noise when in fact it is not. When the memory cooler was run independently, away from the CPU cooler, it ran almost silent.
without cooler 1 without cooler 2
During the testing of the setups above, special care was taken to ensure that the BIOS settings used matched whenever possible. A fresh install of Windows Vista was also used before the benchmarking began, with a full defrag of the hard drive once all the drivers and software were installed, preventing any possible performance issues due to leftover drivers from the previous motherboard installations. For the 3DMark and gaming tests a single card configuration was used.
For testing the memory we used a number of synthetic benchmarks and games:
Synthetic Benchmarks
  • Lavalys Everest 4.10
  • SuperPI mod_1.5
  • Sisoft Sandra 2009
3D Benchmarks
  • 3DMark Vantage
  • Far Cry 2
As the kit is clocked to 1600MHz in stock format, the CPU base clock will not need to be overclocked as the dividers on the P55 chipset allow a maximum of 1600MHz. Add to that the X.M.P profiling and the setup was very easy with this feature enabled.
SPD stock
As the Dominator GTs now utilise Micron chips instead of the highly clockable but unreliable Elpida Hypers I was not holding out much hope of the dominator GTs clocking much higher than the stock 1600MHz. I am however happy to report that the kit clocked very well reaching a none to shabby 1980MHz, just a touch from the golden 2000MHz. At this clockspeed however, the kit was a little unstable so I dropped them down to a much more stable 1900MHz. Sadly, raising the latencies and increasing the voltage slightly did not affect the overclocking but 1900MHz at CAS 8 is a very good performance for an 8GB kit.
Perhaps with the P55 kit, the most worthwhile overclocks do not arise from screaming bandwidth but tighter timings. Again, the Dominator GT kit impressed, running at CAS 7-7-7 with no trouble whatsoever. Raising the bandwidth at this latency proved troublesome with numerous BSOD but at the stock level, the kit was stable as a rock.
bandwidth latency
After returning the kit back to it's default speed, I ran our standard set of memory benchmarks pitching it against the recently reviewed 4GB GSkill kit. The GSkill kit was run both underclocked (1600MHz and stock speed (2000MHz) to give the best comparison. Special consideration should be given to the 2000MHz results where the CPU was overclocked to 4GHz which will also benefit the benchmark scores. The most significant comparison is like for like (1600MHz vs 1600MHz) but adding the higher clocked kit into the mix shows what difference both bandwidth and CPU speed add versus a larger DDR3 kit.
Let's see how both kits performed...
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next»

Most Recent Comments

30-10-2009, 05:16:54

I Hunta x
nice review webbo, makes me wish i had the money to upgrade to ddr3 now

tho tom shouldnt your above post be "Corsair 1600mhz 8gb memory"??Quote

30-10-2009, 06:19:48

It should, getting all confused, I saw pc3-16000 which is 2000mhz, my bad - was pre caffine Quote

31-10-2009, 03:24:24

been searching for 4GBx2 KITS today which was pretty lame, cause the only ones i found were from crucial.

Anyway, whats the point of these boards being 16GB capable if they barely exist?

btw ace review matey!!! Sexy memory! i want one! Well four!Quote

31-10-2009, 06:00:04

Getting 4GB per stick is pretty expensive and as such most manufacturers stay clear of producing them. It's all about supply/demand. Our recent reviews have shown there is little gain to be had once you get over the 6GB mark unless you are very much infused by Photoshop and video editing/encoding.

Thanks for the commentsQuote

31-10-2009, 13:19:15

Originally Posted by name='w3bbo'
Getting 4GB per stick is pretty expensive and as such most manufacturers stay clear of producing them. It's all about supply/demand. Our recent reviews have shown there is little gain to be had once you get over the 6GB mark unless you are very much infused by Photoshop and video editing/encoding.

Thanks for the comments
I didnt know that. Good to know now! Thnks man!

Btw ...perhaps u would be able to answer a big doubt i am having.

I want to sell my s775 harware as well as my h2o bfg 260, i want to move on to s1156 so i can use a good i7 on either an Asus Extreme Formula III or an Asus Premium or Premium PRO, dunno yet. I mostly use the pc for designing like sketchup, autocad, solidworks and on.

My big doubt is, how does the Nvidia Tesla 2GB compares to an GTX 285 / 295???

What would be more appropriate? And also would the tesla fold more PPD then a 285?

If u can help me with that one, give me a help please!



Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.