XFX Radeon HD 5670 1GB Review




Well it can be safely said that from our testing process that we quite liked the XFX Radeon HD 5670. In terms of performance, it sits around the realms of GeForce 8800 and Radeon HD 3800 series graphics cards of the past but benefits from being smaller and cooler with of course lower power consumption. Even amongst the usual competitors, XFX holds a major advantage in that it's cooling solution is single slot, thus allowing it to fit in smaller cases.  Finally, it should also be mentioned once more that the graphics card's Multi-Monitor support is a feature that puts it well ahead of it's competition from team green.

A part of me does question the Radeon HD 5670's value for money. For those of whom that need a low power graphics card for Home Theater PC usage or purely for Multi-Monitor support then even the entry level HD 5450 for as little as £37 would suffice. On the other hand, those who play games could spend as little as £20 more for an additional 60% stream processing power or a further £20 to double it with the Radeon HD 5750 and 5770 respectively. I can see this graphics card appealing to those who don't need the additional power but I genuinely wonder why an end user wouldn't spend a small amount more for something that'll go a long way with newer games. That said, the HD 5670 does benefit from lower power consumption and its smaller size allows it to fit in small Mini ITX form factor cases.

On that basis, I am not willing to give the Radeon HD 5670 any value for money prizes as it isn't quite there in terms of price. It's performance however is still admirable given it's specification and may still represent good value for those who have absolutely no scope to raise their Graphics Card budget.

The Good
- Small, Single Slot Solution
- Relatively Quiet
- Low Power Consumption
- ATi Eyefinity Support
- Reasonable Performance

The Mediocre
- A price tag nearer the £60-70 mark would represent better value

The Bad
- None

We would like to thank XFX for the card on test today, you discuss this in our forums.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

16-03-2010, 14:26:30

Liking this...Quote

16-03-2010, 15:44:13

Just wandering - how does the Microsoft Flight Simulator X FPS graph have a higher AverageFPS than Maximum FPS??Quote

16-03-2010, 15:57:59

Originally Posted by name='a8875624'
Just wandering - how does the Microsoft Flight Simulator X FPS graph have a higher AverageFPS than Maximum FPS??
This is usually caused by reviewers who are a tad blind...

This has now been fixed. Good spot Quote

18-03-2010, 23:22:35

is this card worth upgrading to from an ATI 4670? or should I get the 5750? right now my max resolution is 1440x900.Quote

18-03-2010, 23:50:35

mate get the 5770 i did like u made a mess up gettin the 4670 but mines was the 1gb it was still gash get the 5770 and xfire it! u might match the 5870 in performance synthetic? still one im watchin other than folding gpu's!!!Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.