XFX 8800 GTS 512 and Asus 8800 GT 512 - G92 shoot out

Call of Duty 4, F.E.A.R. and Bioshock

Call of Duty 4
Call of Duty 4 is a stunning DirectX 9.0c based game that really looks awesome and has a very full featureset. With lots of advanced lighting, smoke and water effects, the game has excellent explosions and is fast and furious, perfect for our test suite.
call of duty 4
As you can see here, the 8800 GTS tops the pile in terms of highest FPS, but had a few slight dips in FPS at points. The 8800 GTX showed a more smooth overall performance through testing but, in all honesty there wasn't a whole lot to pick between any of the 8800 series cards and even the HD3850 kept up with the pace.
F.E.A.R. is a game based on the Lithtech Jupiter EX engine. It has volumetric lighting, soft shadows, parallax mapping and particle effects. This is a fairly old game but was a very testing one at the time of release and still looks fantastic, so we've kept it in.
F.E.A.R. always produces slightly odd results if you look at the fine details. However, as an overview, the XFX 8800 GTS was the best performer with the 8800 GTX and Asus 8800 GT not too far behind. All cards ran F.E.A.R. with no problem at all.
Bioshock is a game based on the Unreal Engine 3. It uses some DirectX10 features such as awesome water and smoke effects. The detail level in the game, combined with a frantic pace makes for an excellent benchmark.
Bioshock again shows the trend for the GTS and the GT to be very quick. The 8800 GTX had a little "blip" in this game and I couldn't for the life of me figure out why it's results weren't as good as the other two 8 series cards, even after many repeat runs. Still, every card was smooth as butter in this game at this resolution.
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next»

Most Recent Comments

24-12-2007, 16:39:23

Been waiting for the OC3D to take a look at the 8800 GTS 512mb G92?


Well I've been working hard

Take a look!Quote

24-12-2007, 17:24:49

Great insight into the higher end of the gpu spectrum.

I have to be fair, even tho u`ve got a 1 to 4 positioning, I don`t think there`s that much in it for any of them. I know the Ati slides in the rankings, but it does show itself to be a fine card.

An interesting comparison would have been performance versus costing, seeing as they`re as close as they appear to be.

I`m a bit at odds with the oc results too. I simply can`t achieve the memory overclock on my GT without it having fits. But I can clock the gpu to around 720 (from 670).

What would impress me is some1 buying the cheapest GT, putting it under water, and claiming back those clock hertz with their superior cooling. Sounds nice.

Suprizes me a bit tho that the GTS isn`t launched as a bigger performer. Although pricewize, it does seem to start from stock where the GT limit starts. Leaving u further to climb

Nice review m8, think every1s doing the "going to bed early to get up early" trick Quote

24-12-2007, 17:25:40

Nice to see this review is finally up

Shame I cant view it as 128k is painfully slow :sleep:Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.