Sapphire 4890 Vapor-X PCIe Graphics Card

Packaging & Appearance

Packaging & Appearance
Straight out of the blocks, the Sapphire 4890 Vapor-X looks ice cold to the touch with Antarctic scene. I must say this is a pleasant break from the tired routine of displaying CGI Characters and as aesthetically pleasing ATI's Ruby might be, I do tire of seeing her plastered on every ATI product I come across. It's plainly obvious by the front of the box that Sapphire intend to promote this cards cooler being that the Vapor-X emblem takes pride of place in the centre of the box. A brief run down of the features are also displayed on the front with the main title of Radeon HD4890 displayed towards the bottom of the package on an icy silver backdrop. Flipping the box over, Sapphire go on to display the product highlights and features in greater detail.
box front box rear
One thing I have heavily criticised Sapphire for in the past is the lacklustre packaging methods but the Vapor-X 4890 has seen a revised method of using a plastic insert to hold the anti-static, bubble wrapped card in place. Beneath this is a further cardboard box holding the accessories meaning a much improved package overall. The included accessories quite good with a DVI-HDMI dongle, two twin Molex to PCI-6 pin power cables, a Crossfire bridge, PowerDVD, DVD suite, a copy of Futuremark Vantage and the driver CD concluding the list.
inner box accessories
The card itself is a very attractive affair with the Vapor-X cooler sitting atop a fetching blue PCB. While I'm not a great fan of coloured PCB's, blue does match the cards aesthetics quite nicely. The card is as long as a standard ATX motherboard is wide so there should be no issues with fitting the card in a standard ATX sized case. A further heatsink sits abreast the MOSFETs with the Sapphire name emblazoned across the top.
card top card bottom
The black plastic fan is very quiet in operation being almost silent when idle. Cool air is taken in from the fan and then blown over the Aluminium finned heatsink underneath which in turn cools the copper Vapor chamber. Because of the thickness of the cooling design, the card is a dual slot version, much the same as the reference cards. Like the reference ATI cooler, the Vapor-X cooler is partially shrouded to prevent hot exhaust air from escaping into the PC case and instead directs the flow to the rear finned I/O plate.
fan card side
The I/O plate itself interestingly houses DVI, VGA as well as HDMI ports allowing all the technology of today to be connected through this card. At the back end of the card we see that the 4890 requires 2x 6-pin PCI power cables to be connected despite the cards revised power circuitry. Regulating the power behind the PCIe ports are solid capacitors ensuring greater reliability of the card along with Sapphires own 'Black Diamond'  power choke which Sapphire claim run 10% cooler and offer up to 25% better power efficiency than a standard choke.
PCI card rear
Removing the heatsink assembly was as easy as removing a stock reference heatsink as just four screws hold it in place around the GPU core area. A further two screws hold the MOSFET cooler in place. With these coolers removed we can see the 4890's nakedness in all it's glory.
card naked card base
The Vapor-X cooler is based on the same principles of heatpipe technology we have become familiar with in the past with a liquid coolant vaporising closest to the core and then condensing towards the top of the cooler only to be returned back to the hot surface. If you want to know more about Vapor-X click, HERE. How good this process works will be examined in our test setup area when we place the card under some extreme load conditions. Nevertheless, it is nice to see Sapphire have used copper as the contact surface rather than inefficient aluminium.
contact core
The Sapphire HD4890 Vapor-X uses the same memory chips as the stock reference cards. In this case however the 1GB of GDDR5 Qimonda chips are clocked to a massive 4.2GHz. This will hopefully negate the very conservative GPU core overclock. Below right, we see the 16 MOSFET's which also interestingly have space for an additional two. This leads me to believe that perhaps 14 are used for the core with two reserved for the memory being that this version is the 1GB GDDR5 rather than the separately available 2GB which would likely incorporate the additional MOSFETS required to regulate the power of an extra 1GB.
memory fets
Sapphire have designed a very attractive card, not only in the packaging but also the card itself. The accessory list is complete enough to get everyone started and one might even wish to venture into the world of benchmarking given that Sapphire have also included Futuremarks Vantage. I would perhaps liked to have seen an included game but if this omission keeps the price down then I can see the reasoning behind not including one.
Let's take a look at the test setup I will be using today to evaluate the performance of the Sapphire HD4890 Vapor-X... 
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

02-06-2009, 06:42:45

the card peforms extremely well, but the card looks horrible when will sapphire discover good looking card chassisQuote

02-06-2009, 07:29:13

Sweet review man, massive props to Sapphire for final sticking a non reference cooled card on the market. Any idea when these will be available?Quote

02-06-2009, 14:51:16

Nice review as always my good man!

I wasn't sure that these coolers would make much odds over other after market coolers but those temps are pretty damn good.Quote

08-06-2009, 12:40:40

very nice review!

Is that cooler good enought?Quote

30-06-2009, 18:05:52

Well actually I am not quite convinced. You see almost solely based on this review I went merrily our and promptly bought 2 of these cards only to find that .

1) They run a lot hotter than stated. 67 Celcius at idle and run so hot when gaming that my PC crashes. I haven't managed to record the temp just before crash-poin but I have seen it at upto a blistering 93 Celcius!

2) I don't get anywhere near the FPS stated in the article. Infact I get exactly the same when playing CoD World at War online with 2 of these cards in crossfire as I did with one 9800GTX+. Namely 91 FPS.

I have plenty of ventilation in my rig and the fans on the HD4890s are certainly working.

At +4000rpm (confirmed by ATIs own CCC program and CPUIDs Hardware Monitor) they are audible let me tell you.

I don't believe my system is to blame despite it not being cutting edge.

Sapphire recommend a bigger PSU. 650W-750W and monitoring my temps with rivatuner.

I have a 620W PSU and run Vista ultimate 64 bit, which doesn't allow rivatuner to work since I downloaded the latest update if you can call it that.

Sys Specs:- [email protected] with Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme cooler and Noctua NF-P12 fan. ASUS Maximus Formula Republic of Gamers motherboard with X38 chipset and 4 GHZ of Kingston HyperX PC9600 RAM @ 1207MHz being cooled with a Corsair Dominator Airflow Fan.

CoolerMaster Real Power M620 Modular PSU.

Vista Ultimate 64 bit OS.

Samsung SpinPoint T166 HD501LJ 500 GB.

All incased in a Aerocool Hi-Tech 7 cabinette with a 40cm fan on the side and 2 x 12cm fans, one infront and one at the back.

Any good advice would be appriciated.

Bilko out.Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.