MSI GTX 1660Ti Gaming X Review

Conclusion

MSI GTX 1660Ti Gaming X Review

Conclusion

The release of the GTX 1660Ti has unquestionably muddied the Nvidia waters. Until now there is usually a place for everything and everything in its place. The range has been relatively clear cut. The GTX 1050Ti for those who play simpler titles. GTX 1060 and 1070 for those needing more performance at an affordable price, the GTX 1080 and Ti for those who need a lot of horsepower. Then came the RTX cards which neatly fit into the scheme with the RTX 2060 having 1070Ti performance and RT features, the RTX 2070 being about the GTX 1080 but with RT features, and the RTX 2080 matching the price and performance of the GTX 1080Ti, but again with Tensor and RT elements. The RTX 2080Ti then moved into the flagship role. The GTX 1660Ti is designed to replace the GTX 1060, with around GTX 1070 performance, and priced at the low end somewhere between the GTX 1060 and GTX 1070, and at the high end around the base model RTX 2060s. Except without the RT feature set. It's extremely confusing.

With the release of the MSI GTX 1660Ti Gaming X, the gap between the top of the GTX 1660Ti range - designed to be a Turing GPU but without the expensive RT and Tensor hardware - is now so close to the price point of the most basic of the RTX 2060 cards. With this in mind, you need to really consider exactly what it is that you want from your graphics card and buy accordingly. For every person who happily concedes the loss of the ray tracing and DLSS elements to ensure that you have the coolest, fastest GTX 1660Ti there will be someone who only cares about absolute performance, or has an inflexible budget, for whom the Gaming X is tough to justify.

It isn't for the lack of performance. If you're upgrading from a much older card, then the Turing GPU at the heart of the GTX 1660Ti has oodles more performance than you'd get from a GTX 1060 and definitely a GTX 960 or older. The ability to run parallel integer and floating point operations brings a lot of performance benefits in higher frame rates and thus more responsiveness. If you're the type of gamer who plays multiplayer games, where every frame counts, then the Gaming X might be the very thing to take you to new heights. We hate to reference any of the Battle Royale titles currently flooding the market, but clearly this is the perfect card if you're bitten by the current hotness that is Apex Legends. Heck, even if you're mainly gaming on any of the competitive multiplayer titles around - DOTA2, League of Legends, Warcraft and the like - then you'll be very pleased with what the GTX 1660Ti Gaming X brings to the party.

At this end of the market though, the balance between extra features and raw performance is heavily weighted towards performance. You spend infinitely more time looking at your screen than you do peering through the side window of your case. Nvidia's current range is now so clogged up with older GTX 1060/1070 cards, which are lowering in price as they move towards the end of its line, and as it stands the RTX 2060 is already competitively priced.

Right now there isn't much wiggle room for a card which purports to lose the RT elements in a cost-saving measure, only to have a partner vendor bump it back up with high-quality cooling and lighting until it's almost overlapping the most affordable RTX 2060 graphics cards. In the war of looks vs performance, we can see most PC gamers siding on the performance side of the spectrum.  

All of this means that the enticement offered by the MSI GTX 1660Ti Gaming X is entirely dependant upon your personal preference. If you don't mind sacrificing a little performance to obtain a card which looks great, offers RGB lighting, and has a great cooler. If, however, you don't really care about how warm or loud your card is, because you've got headphones on and just want the best performance, you'd probably be best doing what we'd do, if  our money were on the line, and grabbing a base model 1660 Ti or an RTX 2060.

MSI GTX 1660Ti Gaming X Review 

Discuss the MSI GTX 1660Ti Gaming X in our OC3D Forums. 

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next»

Most Recent Comments

22-02-2019, 09:53:54

AlienALX
I'd rather get a 2060 and at least get something exclusive.

Which is why I think these cards are all pointless. As much as I find early RTX a little boring I'd rather have it than not, especially now that NVIDIA took a crap on the GTX brand when it launched and told all GTX owners we basically smelled like poo because we didn't have RTX.Quote

22-02-2019, 10:29:56

Dark NighT
I don't get the point of these, Nvidia should have just lowered the pricing on the 2060 to make them sit just below the 300 dollar mark they would sell like hot cakes, instead we get these cards.


If these were sub 200 dollar then yes i could see a point in having them, but they are not so nvidia completely missed the mark on this.Quote

22-02-2019, 10:44:06

tgrech
RTX2060's were already just lower binned RTX2070's made as cheap as they could be to be fair, asking to push a 445mm^2 die (Not far off 1080Ti die size) to 300USD was probably too much.Quote

22-02-2019, 11:27:25

AlienALX
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgrech View Post
RTX2060's were already just lower binned RTX2070's made as cheap as they could be to be fair, asking to push a 445mm^2 die (Not far off 1080Ti die size) to 300USD was probably too much.
Without me checking as I am on my phone how big is Vega 56? Because AMD must be making something with a RRP of £270.

And surely the costs of HBM2 are far greater than those of GDDR6.

Or, is it simply that NVIDIA are so used to bending their customers over that they can't bear to make slightly less on each 2060 sold and would thus rather sell them leftover slop?

I think you'll find it's the latter. They need a reality slap like Intel got when Ryzen came along.Quote

22-02-2019, 11:40:18

tgrech
Obviously different companies have different operating costs and need different margins to break even, we all know NVidia spends orders of magnitudes more on R&D, staff, marketing & upkeep than AMD, while AMD are known to sell their older products without profit margins to maintain marketshare. Also of course older inventory no longer being produced and soon set to be replaced at least in announcements in the coming months quickly becomes a liability if not sold at any price soon(Excess 1060 inventory ofc messed up NVidia's whole launch lineup).Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.