Control RTX/Raytracing PC Analysis

4K Performance - DLSS and Raytracing

Control RTX PC Analysis

4K Performance - DLSS and Raytracing

Yes, Control is an extremely demanding game. Even Nvidia's RTX 2080 Ti finds this game tough. We know that this is not what people expect from a £1,000+ graphics card, but this is always what happens when companies push the graphics envelope. In a way, Control is acting as a modern-day Crysis, boldly taking raytracing and other graphical effects to places where no company has before. 

Sadly, this means that many will find Control's PC performance to be lacking. To enable 4K 60FPS in control natively, we will need a graphics card that is 2x stronger than the RTX 2080 Ti. That's without raytracing. With raytracing, that number doubles again. Nvidia's RT series may be powerful, but we need beefier graphics cards to make the 4K 60FPS dream possible. This is especially true if we want to keep adding raytracing into the mix.  

DLSS goes a long way towards making Control playable at 4K without framerate dips into the 30s. It also enables PC players to add in raytracing without also gaining slideshow framerates (at least on the RTX 2080 Ti). Ultimately, it will be up to players how they want to play Control, be it with raytracing on or off. Either way, there is a compromise.  
  

Control RTX PC Analysis  

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

29-08-2019, 09:56:46

tgrech
Attempting to do anything remotely resembling accurate full-world reflections without RT would have a signifiantly greater performance hit than RT implementations even on todays DXR hardware. The difference is that with RT most lighting effects are both easier to implement and inherently accurate. For instance almost all modern efficient implementations of traditional reflections rely on pre-baked cube maps, which are only useful for static worlds, and don't capture anything that's moving, animated or dynamic, which of course includes player models, other lighting effects and particles. In order to simulate reflections of moving objects you basically have to render the scene twice, so this is often done super selectively, with all sorts of other tricks thrown in to try and law back performance(The simplest being rendering "PIP-style" reflections at a fraction of the resolutions and then scaling and blurring them, which you can get away with for dirty surfaces).Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.