Intel K Series Processors

Technical Specifications

Intel K Series  Processors

Technical Specifications

We've got two rather different processors on test today. Thankfully with the i5 being similar to the i7 we can save you having to read tons of tables by integrating them into one.

On the left is the i5-655K and on the right the i7-875K.

Launch DateQ2'10Q2'10
Processor Numberi5-655Ki7-875K
# of Cores24
# of Threads48
Clock Speed3.2 GHz2.93 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency3.46 GHz3.6 GHz
Intel® Smart Cache4 MB8 MB
Bus/Core Ratio2422
DMI2.5 GT/s2.5 GT/s
Instruction Set64-bit64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.2SSE4.2
Embedded Options AvailableNoNo
Supplemental SKUNoNo
Lithography32 nm45 nm
Max TDP73 W95w
New AES Instructions
Integrated GraphicsYesNo

As you can see they are both designed for fairly different markets, but roughly similar thanks to their use of the LGA1156 socket.

With the i5-655K we find it's absolutely identical to the i5-650 by being a hyperthreaded, dual-core processor with integrated graphics. One of the strange things is that the integrated graphics chip is manufactured using a 45nm process. So the processor is actually twin chip, rather than combined into a single die. This should hopefully allow us plenty of overclocking as the graphics heat wont be directly affecting the CPU die. It also, as with all 32nm Intel chips, has the new AES instruction set we first saw on the 980x. In fact the only difference is that the 655K has an unlocked multiplier.

The i7-875K is identical to the i7-870 that is the heart of our LGA1156 test system here at OC3D towers, but in a similar way to the 655K the difference is that it has an unlocked multiplier. Intel haven't adjusted anything else at all so it's still a hyperthreaded quad, on 45nm without the new AES instructions.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next»

Most Recent Comments

07-06-2010, 10:09:15

When I finally upgrade I'll be looking for a quad-core since I do graphic work. Looks like the $930 is still the best deal. The 655 is pretty sweet though for a dual-core.Quote

07-06-2010, 10:21:57

Yeah, they seem expensive for what they deliver. If anyone was going to spend £300 on a CPU (or more), they would go for an X58, and clock the i7 930. The 1156 platform doesn't seem the logical place to stick these chips, although I suppose that intel don't want to put people off buying the extreme edition chips.

Good review, so good for OC3D, but weird price/platform of chips from intel.Quote

07-06-2010, 11:05:37

WOW thats extreme for aircooled over 5Ghz on waterQuote

07-06-2010, 11:06:40

the conclusion was difficult tbh as there were so many factors to consider. The 875 is cheaper than the 870 but doesnt seem as good. The 655 goes like stink but costs a good chunk more and seems expensive for a dual but it is 32nm.....

Its a tough one to call tbh.Quote

07-06-2010, 15:09:20

I hear ya Tom. Good review regardless. And I think fair scores for both.Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.