AMD Ryzen 2nd Generation Threadripper 2920X and 2970WX Review
PC Mark 10
Published: 29th October 2018 | Source: AMD | Price: |
PC Mark 10
PC Mark 10 is a little more valuable as a testing resource, but still deeply flawed. If anything though it does show that if you're simply doing the average desktop sort of tasks - answering email, quickly cropping a photo, Skyping with your other half - then almost any setup has enough performance to handle it. Then again if you're buying a 10+ core CPU just to answer emails you've got more money than sense.
Most Recent Comments
I'm actually quite tempted to go down the Thread ripper route for my next build.Quote
Not seeing it on my end, quality is as normal as any other video.
I'm actually quite tempted to go down the Thread ripper route for my next build. |
Still no reason for me to upgrade here though. Well, it would be nice, but the cost is just far too high to make any sorta sense. Thing is, I took a risk on a 14 core CPU but looking around a bit? it's kinda starting to pay off. I just checked the specs for FO76 and you need quad core min with QC+HT recc. So we are heading in the right direction.Quote
Not seeing it on my end, quality is as normal as any other video.
I'm actually quite tempted to go down the Thread ripper route for my next build. |
I just wanted to start out with saying that I generally enjoy the content here and I value the reviews you guys do, but I was wondering what the reasoning behind having a graph dedicated to comparing temperatures of various CPUs when the test setup isn't kept identical?
As far as I can tell then only the results for 2950X, 2990WX, 2920x and 2970WX are from using the Coolermaster ML360 RGB TR4 AIO Cooler, whereas the i7-6700k used the Corsair H110i GTX and all other CPUs used the Corsair H110i GT.
In your review of the 2950X and 2990WX you explain the decision for using the coolermaster cooler with: "we're using the Coolermaster MasterLiquid ML360R RGB TR4 for our overclocking tests as there is no chance of keeping these monsters under control when overclocked using an air cooler.", but all other CPUs you compare with were already tested with an AIO, just 280mm instead of 360mm so that seems like an odd justification for changing from your regular setup.
So to go on and conclude that "The days of toasty AMD CPUs are long behind us and the Threadrippers, even with their enormous core counts, still remain cool under pressure." seems odd when you're specifically testing the threadripper CPUs with a beefier cooler than all others you compare it to.
If you didn't feel that your regular cooler, the Corsair H110i GT, would do a good enough job or you had other reasons for testing with the Coolermaster ML360 RGB TR4 then that's fine, but my point is just that the results shouldn't be in the same graph together when they aren't comparable.Quote
It's like the background is wobbling it's pretty weird to be honest, doesn't look like your normal quality of videos.
Either way I know my next upgrade is going to be on my render machine and it will be a threadripper, but still not sure if it will be 1st gen or 2nd gen threadripper.Quote