AMD FX8150 CPU Review


AMD FX8150 CPU Review


The Stock results certainly don't blow us away. Although there is a lot of extra performance in the zLib testing, the CPU Queen and PhotoWorxx results, even when overclocked, only just edge a stock i5-2500K and are put in the shade by the overclocked 2500K. Not an auspicious start.


The Memory benchmarks are a clear improvement over it's predecessor the 1095T, but nowhere near as good as anything on a LGA1155. The write speeds in particular are poor at best.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next»

Most Recent Comments

12-10-2011, 02:43:06

I fear that waiting is not rewarded.Disappointing. Quote

12-10-2011, 02:51:32


EDIT: Wow... i didn't expect it to suck this muchQuote

12-10-2011, 03:00:12

I was secretly hoping AMD could pull it out and get one over intel. Shame. This is like watching the pentium 4 all over again. On paper faster, but in reality slower and much hotter running. Oh well, Sandy Bridge E for me Quote

12-10-2011, 03:24:49

I didn't think it would be good, considering the 125W TDP instead of 140W and the low asking price of $250. SB-E all the way. I'm glad I didn't invest much into an AM3+ board (I got an AM3 board). Hopefully, we'll see some competition between the 8150 and the i5-2500K, price wise (may go 1155, IDK).Quote

12-10-2011, 03:37:40

Fail :/Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.