'

Intel Launches B365 Chipset, Welcome Back 22nm

Is this an upgrade or a downgrade from B360?

Intel Launches B365 Chipset, Welcome Back 22nm

Intel Launches B365 Chipset, Welcome Back 22nm

There has been a lot of Intel news lately, making now the perfect time to slip something under the radar, especially as most companies begin their pre-Christmas wind-down.  

Over the past few months, there has been more than a few rumours about new 22nm Intel chipsets, an attempt to move more of their manufacturing onto an older process node so that the company's valuable 14nm resources can be better utilised to create high revenue processors. 

Intel has officially launched their new B365 chipset (via Intel ARK), a 22nm design which is fairly similar to B360, featuring both upgraded and downgraded aspects. For starters, B365 loses B360's WiFi capabilities and integrated USB 3.1 controller, though B365 offers more chipset PCIe 3.0 lanes (20 vs 12) and supports hardware RAID for PCIe and SATA devices. 

At this time it is unknown whether or not B365 is new silicon or reused B200 series silicon, with B365 featuring the same package size and what appears to be identical I/O specifications to H270. Our bet is that B365 is reused H270 silicon.

Intel Launches B365 Chipset, Welcome Back 22nm

By creating a new mid-range 300 series chipset on 22nm, Intel has allowed themselves to free up more fab space for 14nm processors, higher value products that will ultimately prove more profitable for the company. 
  
You can join the discussion on Intel's B365 chipset on the OC3D Forums

«Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments

14-12-2018, 08:21:56

AlienALX
That's a good idea, IMO. Especially if it keeps costs down. Will be good for vendors to knock out cheap PCs.Quote

14-12-2018, 15:44:30

tgrech
They switched chipset production to 14nm because they expected to be on 10nm by now, chipset node for Intel historically more or less always lags the core node by a generation or two so they can keep the more expensive fab space for the higher margin products while keeping older fab space in wider use until the hardware gets converted or modified to another node much later down the line(Generally, the per-chip economics of a node should eventually improve with each generation, but of course the upfront costs are generally much higher and initial yields much lower, so keeping a node in life for much longer than it's cutting edge is pretty important regarding its economic viability). But of course things have fallen a little out of step and now the chipset side needs to hop back abit too to keep demand balanced until 10nm is a viable node for most of their CPUs.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.