Intel attempts to block performance comparisons in Spectre update terms and conditions

Intel adds controversial Terms and Conditions to their latest microcode update

Intel attempts to block performance comparisons in Spectre update terms and conditions

Intel attempts to block performance comparisons in Spectre update terms and conditions

Intel's latest set of Spectre and Meltdown microcode updates have started to spread to systems via OS updates, with Microsoft's latest Windows 10 update addressing Spectre 3a (CVE-2018-3640: "Rogue System Register Read (RSRE)"), Spectre Variant 4 (CVE-2018-3639: "Speculative Store Bypass (SSB)") and the company's recently revealed L1TF (CVE-2018-3615, CVE-2018-3646: "L1 Terminal Fault") exploit. 

While this update may not seem out of the ordinary, it includes a new clause in Intel's licensing terms and conditions. This new license terms will prevent licensees from providing or publishing "software benchmark or comparison test results". The full licence is available to read here

Intel's Spectre and Meltdown updates are already known to negatively impact system performance, though thankfully the impact of these changes are minimal on consumer systems. Even so, this growing list of software mitigation is likely to add up sooner or later to increasingly large performance downsides. Intel likely fears how future before/after Spectre performance comparisons will impact their brand image, and the sales of their products. 

Intel attempts to block performance comparisons in Spectre update terms and conditions  

At a minimum, this term is unethical, preventing consumers within both the server and consumer markets from judging the impact of current and future spectre mitigations. It is also possible that this clause is legally unenforceable, or illegal depending on your country's laws.   

This clause is a blatant attempt to silence users, forbidding them from publishing performance comparisons or impact assessments for the company's Spectre microcode mitigations. This clause will likely spark another backlash against Intel, which may harm the brand's reputation just as much as the performance losses caused by their firmware mitigations. 

Update - Intel has released the following statement following the criticisms of Intel's licensing agreement. 

   We are updating the license now to address this and will have a new version available soon. As an active member of the open source community, we continue to welcome all feedback.

You can join the discussion on Intel's controversial microcode terms and conditions on the OC3D Forums

«Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments

23-08-2018, 09:00:01

Luckily that'll never fly in court.Quote

23-08-2018, 09:12:59

lmao good luck with that oneQuote

23-08-2018, 09:18:26

I will admit that I will never have an AMD system and I love Intel.....however this is absolutely batshiit crazy. There is absolutely NO WAY that this is going to hold up in court.

Intel is scared crapless....that's all there is to it.Quote

23-08-2018, 11:45:57

I didn't really need more reasons to go with Ryzen on my next build, but more reasons always help. Makes the decision so much easier.Quote

23-08-2018, 11:47:38

seems that there is a winner lol.Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.