CPU-Z version 1.79 has a new benchmarking tool

CPU-Z version 1.79 has a new benchmarking tool

CPU-Z version 1.79 has a new benchmarking tool

CPU-Z version 1.79 has a new benchmarking tool

 
Some of you may have already noticed that CPU-Z version 1.79 now includes a new benchmarking tool, which offers scores that are not comparable to CPU-ID's older benchmark tool. 
 
This new tool measures CPU performance differently than CPU-ID's previous performance tool, which allowed AMD's Ryzen CPUs to perform much higher than Intel's Skylake architecture clock/clock. This 30% increase in clock/clock performance was not found to be replicable outside of this benchmark, which made results from the previous CPU-Z benchmark very misleading for consumers. 
 
Results from CPUID's new benchmark will be lower than their previous benchmark, especially on Ryzen-based systems due to the recent changes in this benchmark's design. This new benchmark will now offer better support for highly threaded CPUs and offer performance numbers that are a lot more representative of what each CPU is capable of. 
 
Below what CPUID has to say about this new benchmark tool and why these new changes were implemented. 
 
 
 
 

Why are the scores much lower than the previous version, and can they be compared ?

At the time the first benchmark was released in 2015, only a few parts included 8 cores (like the 5960X). In the meantime, Ryzen was introduced, and therefore 6 and 8-cores processors will become more and more prevalent. As a result, more models with 10, 12 and 16 cores are soon to be released. More cores mean higher multi-threaded scores, and a lower scale makes the comparisons easier. The new benchmark uses a new algorithm, and its scores can not be compared with the previous version.

Why do the Ryzen performance decrease in comparison to the Intel processors with the new benchmark ?

When the 1st version of the benchmark was released in 2015, it was tested on all existing architectures to check the relevancy of the scores. Almsot two years later, Ryzen was introduced, and scored - core for core and clock for clock - almost 30% higher than Intel Skylake. After a deep investigation, we found out that the code of the benchmark felt into a special case on Ryzen microarchitecture because of an unexpected sequence of integer instructions. These operations added a noticeable but similar delay in all existing microarchitectures at the time the previous benchmark was developed. When Ryzen was released, we found out that their ALUs executed this unexpected sequence in a much more efficient way, leading to results that mismatch the average performance of that new architecture. We reviewed many software and synthetics benchmarks without being able to find a single case where such a performance boost occurs. We're now convinced that this special case is very unlikely to happen in real-world applications. Our new algorithm described below does not exhibit this behaviour.

What algorithm does the benchmark use, and what instruction set is used ?

The new benchmark computes a 2-dimensional noise function, that could typically be used in a game to generate a procedural map. The code is written in C++, and compiled with Visual C++ 2008. No special instruction set is used, but the x64 version uses scalar SSE/SSE2 instructions to achieve floating point operations, whereas the 32-bit version keeps using the legacy x87 instructions, resulting in almost half of the x64 performance.

When will the benchmark pages be updated with the new benchmark results ?

The new benchmark was released 10 days ago, and thousands of scores were recorded in the meantime, We're curently building a new database with these results and plan to put it online during this week.

 

 

CPU-Z version 1.79 has a new benchmarking tool  

 

This new benchmark tool has been available for the past 10 days, though only now has CPUID reported on changes to the benchmark's functionality.

 

You can join the discussion on CPU-Z's new CPU benchmarking tool on the OC3D Forums.

 

«Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments

01-05-2017, 12:17:15

NeverBackDown
As great as this is, really not sure how it would hold up to be put into reviews for testing all the time. Consistency is key here.Quote

01-05-2017, 12:26:46

WYP
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeverBackDown View Post
As great as this is, really not sure how it would hold up to be put into reviews for testing all the time. Consistency is key here.
We have no plans to add it to review testing at this time, but it is useful that people know that new results should not be compared to old benchmark results anymore.

This tool will need to prove itself before it is considered as a standard CPU benchmark for our performance testing.Quote

01-05-2017, 12:57:30

NeverBackDown
Yep, thats what I saidQuote

04-05-2017, 04:15:59

rigel023
Dope!Quote

04-05-2017, 06:32:21

BigDaddyKong
ouch, someone does not love their 1700 much pumping that much voltage through it.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.