Super Talent 128GB SATA II SSD

Real world testing

Dummy File Creation
 
This next test measures how each drive performs when writing files to itself, to do this we use a utility called Dummy File Creator. If we were to copy a file from a slower mechanical drive to the SSD, we would get false results due to the mechanical drive slowing down the file transfer, Dummy File Creator takes away the need to use another drive when testing writing to the SSD.  The first 16GB benchmark writes a collection of files ranging in size from 1GB to 100KB, whereas the 100GB benchmark writes a single file of exactly that size to the disk.
 
 
 
 
Unreal Tournament 3 Level Loading
 
As with Rich's other benchmarks, I have recreated his tests faithfully. The Unreal Tournament 3 Level Loading was no exception. A fresh copy of Vista was installed and then Unreal Tournament 3 was installed.  The test is simple, start up Unreal Tourney 3, select ONS-Torlan map and measure the time it takes to load from clicking on "Begin" button,  to stay true to the test this process was repeated a total of three times with a reboot between each test to clear system memory.
 
 
 
Vista Boot/Shutdown Time
 
A simple test which shows how quickly the system could boot and launch a text file from the startup folder.  A fresh copy of Vista SP1 was installed and then testing was carried out.  To ensure the tests were fair the results were averaged over initial reboots.  Shutdown times were also recorded, as found with previous testing though this generally happened pretty quickly and acuracy was hard to obtain.
 
 
 
 
Results Analysis
 
In the Dummy File Creation 16gb test the ST FTM28GX25H is slightly slower than its nearest rvials which has somewhat surprised me.  In the previous benchmarks the ST drive had proven to be consistant at beating both of OCZ's drive when it came to file writing.  Moving onto the 100GB file test, the results are the same, but  the time difference is somewhat narrower the ST FTM28GX25H is still slightly slower though.  Moving onto the Unreal Tournament III Map Loading test the 3 SSD drives are to close to call, all completed the test withing miliseconds of each other.  Taking a look at the Windows Vista Boot Time test, you can see once again the time difference between the SSD's is marginal and the same with the Vista Shutdown Time test, with the ST FTM28GX25H losing to the OCZ Summit but beating the OCZ Vertex drives.
 
Ok, so we have seen the test results lets turn over and see what we can conclude from them.
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next»

Most Recent Comments

25-09-2009, 04:48:00

JN
"Is the noise of your current HDD driving you mad? Thinking of buying an SSD but dont know which to get? Perhaps Super Talents FTM28GX25H could be what your looking for. Read on to find out." - by Wes

http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...162100259s.jpg

Super Talent 128GB SATA II SSD

25-09-2009, 08:04:00

VonBlade
SSDs are easily the most desirable piece of hardware around. Silent, super fast, cool. This one is fast and reasonably priced. What's more to ask?

It scores 10 on the VB want-o-meter.

25-09-2009, 08:13:24

Rastalovich
In a climate where we often see the judgement of particularly graphic cards as a matter of /fps, despite the performance. Would it be a reasonable request to add /G at the bottom of the comparison table for the range of tested drives ?

Could be a good inclusion in cpu comparisons also being as, looking from the gaming pov, anything above a 3.2g (or so) P4 is regarded as a "minimum" requirement.

25-09-2009, 08:59:56

Datamonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='Rastalovich'
In a climate where we often see the judgement of particularly graphic cards as a matter of /fps, despite the performance. Would it be a reasonable request to add /G at the bottom of the comparison table for the range of tested drives ?

Could be a good inclusion in cpu comparisons also being as, looking from the gaming pov, anything above a 3.2g (or so) P4 is regarded as a "minimum" requirement.
Hi Rasta,

Its a good idea and something i was going to include with this review, but as I was unable to find a uk price for the drive it would be unfair to just convert the $ to as we know that just does not happen when it comes to pc hardware. If i can find a uk price in the future its something I will be sure to include

VB,

100% Agree with you fella, now I would love to find out how they would perform in a raid 0 setup Will have to wait until their available in the uk though.

29-09-2009, 11:44:28

Bungral
When you say /G do you mean per GB???

If it's to be likened to the /FPS comparison, then surely it would need to be /Read & Write speed.

Think I know what I'm getting at.

Quote:
Originally Posted by name='Rastalovich'
In a climate where we often see the judgement of particularly graphic cards as a matter of /fps, despite the performance. Would it be a reasonable request to add /G at the bottom of the comparison table for the range of tested drives ?

Could be a good inclusion in cpu comparisons also being as, looking from the gaming pov, anything above a 3.2g (or so) P4 is regarded as a "minimum" requirement.

29-09-2009, 11:54:32

Datamonkey
Hi Bungral

Nope /G should b3 cost per Gb as in Gigabyte.

Pound cost per Gigabyte.

Say a 128Gb drive costs 300 that would be 128 divided by 300 giving you an approc cost of 2.34 per Gigabyte for the drive

Hope thats makes sense. Doing as per read/write speed wouldnt work.

Cheers

29-09-2009, 16:17:44

Bungral
Yeah that's what I said... /GB

But my point is that if take the ratio on the GFX card which is basically the cost divided by the performance, then doing /GB isn't really cost by performance. It's cost by capacity.

I get that HDD's are generally considered on their capacity, but then it's difficult as performance should be factored in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by name='Datamonkey'
Hi Bungral

Nope /G should b3 cost per Gb as in Gigabyte.

Pound cost per Gigabyte.

Say a 128Gb drive costs 300 that would be 128 divided by 300 giving you an approc cost of 2.34 per Gigabyte for the drive

Hope thats makes sense. Doing as per read/write speed wouldnt work.

Cheers

30-09-2009, 05:59:22

Rastalovich
Yeah cost per gb is the way to go.

It's arguable that the gfxcard's primary concern is to put up a display, but it's critiqued on fps amongst other things.

All things being equal, a hard drive's primary concern is to store information, it's speed to do so may well be it's critique.

However if the gfxcards had 128m of memory on the one hand and 1g on the other, the matter that the 128m model ran crysis on a 320x200x8 screen at 2000fps would be neither hear no there.

30-04-2010, 09:13:03

rrjwilson
UK shop selling this? or do we import and wait 4 months but get t cheaper :S

Oh and I have Super Talent DDR3 2000MHz Dual Channel RAM its the fricking shiznit. 2016MHz on AIR :O summer will stop this though and it will return to 2005MHz

18-05-2010, 17:22:58

hadesan
Will oc3d be doing any reviews of the PCI-Express based SSD storage?
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.