OCZ Summit 250GB SATA2 SSD

PCMark Vantage

PCMark Vantage
 
PCMark Vantage may sound like potentially the most 'synthetic' benchmark on the market, but this couldn't be further from the truth. In a whitepaper published by Futuremark (developers of 3DMark and PCMark) they describe how PCMark mimics actual PC usage by performing application launches, web browsing, video playback, photo editing, file searching, and other day-to-day tasks. This potentially makes PCMark Vantage the most 'real world' benchmark of them all, and therefore we will be breaking down the HDD Suite benchmark into its various sections in the graphs to give you the whole picture.
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Results Analysis
 
The OCZ Summit and Vertex were evenly matched, with perhaps the Summit just squeezing out on top in a couple of tests. However, the Summit fell short in the media department, falling well behind the OCZ Vertex in both media player and movie maker tests. Worst of all was the media centre test where the Summit finished lmiddle of the pack.. This is possibly an anomoly though as throughout the other tests, no such problems were encountered.
 
Let's have a look at some real world tests...
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next»

Most Recent Comments

29-06-2009, 11:16:37

w3bbo
The OCZ Vertex set a very high standard two months ago but suffered mediocre write speeds. Can the Summit SSD make up the deficit? Find out in our latest in-depth review...

http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...121401203l.jpg

Review HERE

29-06-2009, 12:33:52

rapidman17
Great review mate....shame about the price though... is twice as much as the bloody pc i am usin...

29-06-2009, 12:39:55

w3bbo
Yeah I hear ya on the price. Still when people are paying 100 for 30GB I guess it's not so bad lol especially when you consider this is no 'run of the mill' drive.

29-06-2009, 12:40:39

nathan
intel or was it samsung are releasing some cheaper SSDs in the next couple of weeks. Wonder what they'll be like.

29-06-2009, 12:43:52

rapidman17
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='w3bbo'
Yeah I hear ya on the price. Still when people are paying 100 for 30GB I guess it's not so bad lol especially when you consider this is no 'run of the mill' drive.
Fair point i guess.... hopefully if nathan is correct,the introduction of cheaper ssd's will drive down the price of other more expensive ones. These will def be lower performance drives in comparison to the summit and vertex though

29-06-2009, 14:03:35

w3bbo
It greatly depends on the amount of cache the drives carry. Cheap drives usually mean less cache and I would be very hesitant before buying a drive with little/no cache as you will get stutter problems.

29-06-2009, 14:05:32

rapidman17
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='w3bbo'
It greatly depends on the amount of cache the drives carry. Cheap drives usually mean less cache and I would be very hesitant before buying a drive with little/no cache as you will get stutter problems.
Yh thts exactly what i was thinking when i said they would offer lower performance

29-06-2009, 16:57:13

VonBlade
Yipes!!

That's blisteringly fast. Pant-wettingly expensive, but wow such speed.

/green with envy.

29-06-2009, 17:06:44

Ghosthud1
what are ocz thinking! 500 for abit of pcb and chips, i dont think they know the world is in debt

30-06-2009, 14:37:08

Rastalovich
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='w3bbo'
It greatly depends on the amount of cache the drives carry. Cheap drives usually mean less cache and I would be very hesitant before buying a drive with little/no cache as you will get stutter problems.
In the main the SSDs are rated, or quoted, on their ability to empty and fill cache. Being as they're all chips any1, I don't know why they don't just call them cache drives - 250g cache

Pricing is ultimately outrageous, I didn't see anything significant that seperated it from it's vertex partner.

More or less agree with the Mediocre sum-up, u would expect a cheap 3.5 adaptor to be in there as standard.

Packaging wize, I think they're very nervous about making it a good one - criticism then may be that 552, they should charge 499 and keep it very oem.

Good luck to them milking users tbh. They feel the 250g drive is worth more than 2x GTX 285.

30-06-2009, 18:19:47

Toxcity
Once data is in the RAM the harddrive is hardly touched. At that price there is no need for it. Are they stupid?

01-07-2009, 07:26:57

Rastalovich
I have a suspicion also that they're looking at Ultra320 prices, controllers and drives, and thinking "if they can charge that much, so can we".
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.