Crucial M225 128GB
Introduction
Published: 6th January 2010 | Source: Crucial | Price: £282.80 |
Crucial M225 128GB SSD
Introduction
Crucial have been in memory business for a long time and it's only natural for them to have been one of the first companies who provided solid state drives for the home user. Today we will be looking at their M225 128GB SSD which is designed as a large capacity notebook replacement storage solution.
As we're all aware by now a Solid State Drive (SSD) is the number one performance enhancing upgrade you can purchase. Nowhere is this more true than in notebooks where not only do they need every bit of performance assistance they can get, but also any improvement in battery life allows for more productivity. So does the Crucial M225 deliver?
Specifications The Crucial webpage for this particular drive has a very limited specifications page, although it covers most of the details that the average purchaser would be interested in.
| Series Name | Crucial M225 Solid-State Drive |
| Capacity | 128GB |
| Internal Cache | 64MB DRAM |
| Performance | 250MB/s READ, 190MB/s WRITE |
| NAND Flash Components | Multi-Level Cell (MLC) NAND Flash Memory |
| Interface | Serial ATA 3.0Gb/s (SATA) |
| Form Factor | 2.5" (100.20 mm x 69.85 mm x 9.50 mm) |
Heady numbers indeed. Hopefully the small amount of cache relative to other SSDs we've tested recently wont lead to the infamous stuttering problems. Of course there is only one way to find out, but firstly let's take a look at the packaging.
Most Recent Comments
£283 >.<
We're about to be on the crest of drives with controllers capable of bursting over 300mbs as an average, one would hope that they take over the £2/G mantle, whilst the ""slower"" <280mbs existing drives head towards £1.5/G (atleast! ) To that extent, it still doesn't look good.
Think with all the reviews of ssds OC3D has under it's belt, we could throw some comparisons charts together.
Can't mock the performance tho.
|
Originally Posted by name='Rastalovich'
Great review.
£283 >.< We're about to be on the crest of drives with controllers capable of bursting over 300mbs as an average, one would hope that they take over the £2/G mantle, whilst the ""slower"" <280mbs existing drives head towards £1.5/G (atleast! ) To that extent, it still doesn't look good. Think with all the reviews of ssds OC3D has under it's belt, we could throw some comparisons charts together. Can't mock the performance tho. |

As for the graphs- The crucial was tested in a notebook, so it can't really be compared with all the other SSD's which were tested on a desktop IIRC.
Gonna copyright that phrase one of these days. wcwgaw ?
Really, they're quite cheap.
Great review Bry. What were the write speeds like btw?
|
Originally Posted by name='VonBlade'
Huh? Considering it's basically memory chips and a controller, try and get 128GB of RAM for £300 and let me know how you get on.
Really, they're quite cheap. |
U ofc can't buy a 128g strip for £300, but where that argument breaks down is that the actual price of the 128g strips is grossly disproportionate to buying the memory chips seperately, or 2x 64g etc. The price of a 128g strip, again, is wcwgaw - 1000s I have no doubt, and there is no way in hell that it would cost half the price to make it. Think Samsung and some1 else are selling them atm.
What we must remember though is you could spend £300 extra on a cpu or any other speed upgrade and it would not create an impact like an SSD would. You could yes of couse raid up loads of mechanical drives, but that also requires space and power. I was gobsmacked what a difference an SSD had on my rig, when all the TRIM and Firmware issues are ironed out so the drives perform at top speed for months and months I would recomend these to every user. For now though its an enthusiast item, and a very good one at that.
|
Originally Posted by name='tinytomlogan'
At the end of the day Rasta its business, without profit there would be no advances in the industry. We all moan about new tech prices, mainly because we want them but cant afford them. Your argument about the price they pay is irrelevent, thats like saying Dell pay next to nothing for their screens from Samsung so we shouldnt pay the price they want for them.
|
The advance in technology is moving at a snail's pace and has been for maybe 2 decades. It is a very poor representation of cash, and profits made, versus advances.
|
Originally Posted by name='tinytomlogan'
What we must remember though is you could spend £300 extra on a cpu or any other speed upgrade and it would not create an impact like an SSD would. You could yes of couse raid up loads of mechanical drives, but that also requires space and power. I was gobsmacked what a difference an SSD had on my rig, when all the TRIM and Firmware issues are ironed out so the drives perform at top speed for months and months I would recomend these to every user. For now though its an enthusiast item, and a very good one at that.
|
But I do disagree that these are aimed at enthusiasts. These are, and have been for a few years (as it's not new tech), at businesses and the like of people who would buy a top end mbp just to read email.
U could argue for the likes of enthusiasts that buy Alienware products. But to think for the period of time these have been out, that enthusiasts in the main, such as OC3D members, are the target of these devices is crazy. If u took a poll of allthe members, I would be impressed if over 10% had one.
EDIT: I'd even give some leaway on that and say that the SSDs could be of any size from the "cheapest" to the most expensive.
A prime example is the ATI 5000 series, what did we see so many months ago, a uk store selling a card for £596. AND they would be sold out I'm sure. Whereas parts of the populous would say no and still save for it at £150 less.
The old supply and demand donut ? Not when elsewhere they're selling it at the same figure in a different currency.
Some people just want new tech, its ALWAYS been the same, it will never change. I seem to remember the price of 8800GT's being insane when first released as Nvid cleverly hadnt let many out the door. ALL companies do it, not only does it keep prices up but all the forums are buzzing with people waiting to get there hands on them, or like you moaning about the prices.
Its just the same old s..t, just a different product range.
They charge what they feel they can get away with. It's as simple as that. And that aint a moan, it's a statement of the facts as they're seen.
Pretty unnessary swipe at the nvidia camp. I can't remember any insane pricing that dramatically fell. I can remember the very high price of the 8800GTX/Ultras, especially Kemp getting one by methods, which dropped by £50 or so about a month later, as they do with nearly all their products. And that they remained at the high price even tho there were equiv newer cards out a few years l8r. Also a dramatic change in performance at the time, including api, Dx9->10 which is nothing like 10->10.1->11.
Recognizable trend there tho aye

Wish you would take your green glasses off and stop trying to use that line. You sound like some one shouting racist all the freaking time and its getting boring.
Let's be sensible.
What would make it compelling is if etailers outside of the UK also saw fit to ++£150 (or whatever). I do know when we found the £596 card, the equiv wasn't hyked the same way in other countries.
|
Originally Posted by name='Ham'
Get back on topic and stop bickering.
|

Continue Reading