XFX Radeon HD 5670 1GB Review

Testbed, ATi CCC & Overclocking

Testbed

Intel Core i3 530 Dual Core Processor @ 2.93GHz
Biostar TH55XE H55 Motherboard
4GB Corsair PC3-12800 DDR3 Memory
XFX Radeon HD 5670 1GB GDDR5 Graphics Card
320GB Samsung Spinpoint F1 7200RPM Hard Disk Drive
Samsung 22x DVD+/-RW
Be Quiet! 750W 80PLUS Silver Power Supply Unit
Arctic Cooling MX3 Paste
Windows 7 Home Premium x64

ATi Catalyst Control Centre

For some time now, the ATi Catalyst Control Centre has proven itself to be a very capable driver control panel. Despite it's bloated nature, when compared to the less graphical and original ATi Catalyst control panel, it is both responsive and reasonably intuitive. From a memory consumption standpoint, it occupies around 18MB on our testbed machine.

The main three areas of the Catalyst Control Center are the 3D, Display and Overdrive sections. In 3D, one is able to set Anti Aliasing and Anisotropic filtering. You're provided with a short preview video indicating the effect of the parameter that you've changed. Wasted space for those who know what they're doing but excellent for the novices.

The desktop and displays section covers just about anything that's Multi Monitor related. Here, you may adjust the mode of your multi-monitor setup, create groups and rearrange your monitors' positions. We'll return to this later.

Finally, we get to the Overdrive section. Here, it is possible to overclock the XFX Radeon HD 5670 from it's nominal frequencies to 850MHz Core and 1050MHz Memory (4200MHz effective).

Overclocking

Due to Catalyst Control Centre's low limit, our overclocking endeavours could not exceed 850MHz Core and 1050MHz memory. This is however one should not necessarily turn their noses up at a 75MHz increase on core and a 50MHz increase on memory.

Up next...Eyefinity.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

16-03-2010, 05:55:25

tinytomlogan
Mul takes his onboard graphics hat off and takes a look at the XFX Radeon HD 5670 1GB GDDR5

Continue Reading

16-03-2010, 14:26:30

Socks
Liking this...

16-03-2010, 15:44:13

a8875624
Just wandering - how does the Microsoft Flight Simulator X FPS graph have a higher AverageFPS than Maximum FPS??

16-03-2010, 15:57:59

Mul.
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='a8875624'
Just wandering - how does the Microsoft Flight Simulator X FPS graph have a higher AverageFPS than Maximum FPS??
This is usually caused by reviewers who are a tad blind...

This has now been fixed. Good spot

18-03-2010, 23:22:35

Makol
is this card worth upgrading to from an ATI 4670? or should I get the 5750? right now my max resolution is 1440x900.

18-03-2010, 23:50:35

thestepster
mate get the 5770 i did like u made a mess up gettin the 4670 but mines was the 1gb it was still gash get the 5770 and xfire it! u might match the 5870 in performance synthetic? still one im watchin other than folding gpu's!!!

19-03-2010, 01:27:18

Makol
I got my 4670 for $45USD and I needed to replace an extremely outdated x1300 on a low budget. And I made a typo and typed 5750 when I meant 5770.
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.