XFX Radeon HD 5670 1GB Review

Packaging & Initial Impressions

 

Packaging & Initial Impressions

     

The XFX Radeon HD 5670 arrived in a compact and well decorated box. The front of the box sports the products name in large bold font and it's key features are listed as well. Inside you will find the graphics card in it's own plastic shroud and on the outside a driver disc and "easy install" manual. XFX also include a rather novel "DO NOT DISTURB" note for your door handle, which you may wish to use if your prerogative is private, intense and outrageously hardcore gaming behind closed doors...

     

The graphics card itself is a very compact solution with a length of just 17cm. In terms of it's physical dimensions, I would be led to believe that this graphics card could prove ideal for Home Theater PC/Compact PC solutions with the Mini ITX form factor. 

At the rear of the graphics card, you will find three monitor outputs. DVI, HDMI and Displayport. If you wish to use an Analog VGA monitor, you will have to buy a DVI->VGA adapter as XFX does not include one in the package. Further, for those who wish to use three monitors at or above 1920x1200 and lack a Displayport input, you will need an Active Displayport Adapter. For lower resolutions, a standard Displayport adapter will suffice.

The heatsink is unsurprisingly very small and of single slot height. It covers the GPU Core and four of it's GDDR5 Memory IC's with it's copper base.

At this stage, I would gather that it's cooling solution is more than adequate, however I do have my reservations about the noise levels of it's low diameter fan.

In terms of installation, the procedure was trouble free. On our open testbench, the Radeon HD 5670's heatsink fan was audible but certainly not a pest.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

16-03-2010, 05:55:25

tinytomlogan
Mul takes his onboard graphics hat off and takes a look at the XFX Radeon HD 5670 1GB GDDR5

Continue Reading

16-03-2010, 14:26:30

Socks
Liking this...

16-03-2010, 15:44:13

a8875624
Just wandering - how does the Microsoft Flight Simulator X FPS graph have a higher AverageFPS than Maximum FPS??

16-03-2010, 15:57:59

Mul.
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='a8875624'
Just wandering - how does the Microsoft Flight Simulator X FPS graph have a higher AverageFPS than Maximum FPS??
This is usually caused by reviewers who are a tad blind...

This has now been fixed. Good spot

18-03-2010, 23:22:35

Makol
is this card worth upgrading to from an ATI 4670? or should I get the 5750? right now my max resolution is 1440x900.

18-03-2010, 23:50:35

thestepster
mate get the 5770 i did like u made a mess up gettin the 4670 but mines was the 1gb it was still gash get the 5770 and xfire it! u might match the 5870 in performance synthetic? still one im watchin other than folding gpu's!!!

19-03-2010, 01:27:18

Makol
I got my 4670 for $45USD and I needed to replace an extremely outdated x1300 on a low budget. And I made a typo and typed 5750 when I meant 5770.
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.