XFX Fatal1ty 8600 GT Professional Series
Game Benchmarks - Quake 4 and C&C 3
Published: 1st July 2007 | Source: XFX | Price: |
Quake 4 is a game built on the Doom 3 engine. This uses many DX 9.0c features and is a game that nVidia traditionally did well on being an OpenGL game. Once again I did three two minute runs on Quake 4 on each card and took the average of all my readings from these. I played a fast and furious part of the game that required both internal and external scenes.
Quake 4 was played at 1280 x 1024 with 2 x AA (Ultra settings)

C&C3 is the much awaited RTS from EA. Hugely popular and with some pretty nice visuals almost every modern PC should be able to play it. I tested a skirmish right at the end when I had a screen full of mechs to defeat the enemy.
C&C 3 was played at 1280 x 1024 with all maximum settings apart from the AA which was set to level 2 in-game.

The game tests have shown that the XFX fatal1ty 8600 GT can play with the fastest cards out there in it's class. Now let's take a look at the artificial benchmarks...
Most Recent Comments
It`s a decent performer, and gives u the cooling benefits, if that`s the solution u`r after. @ ~ £111, I don`t think u can go that wrong tbh, cards in that bracket are only give or take a small sum.
The packaging does seem disappointing. Package clutter doesn`t cost the company anything at all, and promo stuff especially. Infact the XFX 7600GT 580m is packaged a whole lot better and is obviously an older card.
What impresses me most is the clocking of the Foxconn GTS card - but that detracts from the topic I guess >.<
If XFX are fishing for some impressive feedback, the backplane slot needs a bit of `tarting up`. Something as simple as XFX 8600 GT Fatal1ty in a green raised stamping on their black background would not only promote the card visually, but further seperate it from the mainstream. From the back as it stands, it looks like a regular XFX -anything- card.
Another thing, people will be put off with the likes of the 3DMark scores - that`s a shame. It`s not enough to dismiss the card imo, when it performs obviously better in `the real world`.
(oh and correct the reference to an 8700 on page 4, I got overly excited when I saw that)
The clocks on that thing seem to be huge compared to stock, I'm suprised it can pull it off as much as it does being passive.
@Rast - the foxconn OC's more as it is a stock-clocked card. People generally would rather buy the fastest out there but the small enthusiast overclocking segment would (and should) buy the cheapest and OC that
Still a nice cooler like this one gives you a great reason to buy the card

I would have to say though that i see a flaw on page 2 Kemp. The cooler looks like a modified version of the one i have and if thats true the memory is not cooled at all.
|
Originally Posted by name='PP Mguire'
I would have to say though that i see a flaw on page 2 Kemp. The cooler looks like a modified version of the one i have and if thats true the memory is not cooled at all.
|
http://upload.overclock3d.net/get.php?id=3180
Edit: Well yes it is actually cooled according to the image.


One thing I am not sure about is this.
The 8600GT has two Dual Link DVI ports for output as well as an S-Video out. It's at this point I will remind you that no HDTV connection is included, which is a shame. Having said that, the DVI ports are both HDCP enabled so you should be good to go if you want to connect to your HDCP enabled HDTV...if it has DVI-in.
If the card has HDCP, wouldn't a simple adapter cable allow it to be fully compatible with HDMI televisions?

|
Originally Posted by name='Gibbs'
Kempez could you take a few measurements
|
thanks bud 
Its left me with a dilema now I will Watercool GPU(s) in the not too distant future, once i get my feet wet.Would it be worth Going SLi on this then liquid cool eventualy OC?
Since i've been reading the forums i am gettin more tempted
(its taken me 10 years to put a multimeter on my PSU)My current setup is 2 year old being on benifit its hard to keep up but OC'ing will help.Or would i be better off spending the same £ on One card? I Have more questions but i'll limit them


And isn't that card very very pretty!
Hah! Must be nice, considering i have a bigger one on my video card and my memory is not being cooled at all.Edit: Well yes it is actually cooled according to the image.

XFX Fatal1ty 8600 GT Potential for more oc'ing with liquid
v
XFX 8600 GTS XXX Massivly oc'd already.
I'd appreciate some input i'm lookin to spend £250 on 2xSLI or One card
Cheers.
As for choice between the two - they're clocked the same, but if you're watercooling you may as well get the cheapest
But for a selfish reason, I`d like to see how the 2 x 8600 get on >.<
|
Originally Posted by name='Rastalovich'
Ya for the price of 2 x 8600GT, I`d rather 1 x 8800 tbh.
|

Only if you have an 8800GTX and a wad of cash burning a hole in your pocket, with absolutely nothing else to buy, should you consider SLI.
|
Originally Posted by name='Rastalovich'
Ya for the price of 2 x 8600GT, I`d rather 1 x 8800xx tbh.
But for a selfish reason, I`d like to see how the 2 x 8600 get on >.< |
Cheers p33ps.
Time to hunt for 8800xx http://upload.overclock3d.net/get.php?id=3100&view=1

Have a look-see