Sapphire X1950 Pro Dual
Overclocking
Published: 3rd May 2007 | Source: Sapphire | Price: |
Overclocking on the nVidia cards was performed using Rivatuner. Overclocking on the ATI card was performed using the built-in "Overdrive" facility in the ATI catalyst drivers.
The Sapphire X1950 Pro Dual actually didn't doo too bad for a dual GPU configuration, with a core overclock of around 47MHz (8%) and a memory overclock of 104Mhz (14%).
Anything over the mentioned settings and the overclock failed. Not too bad although I think this is probably due to the limits of the dual GPU configuration.
3DMark06 Overclocked
To test the overclock I ran 3DMark06 test. This allows you to see how the overclock affected performance.
3DMark06 Overclocked
To test the overclock I ran 3DMark06 test. This allows you to see how the overclock affected performance.
An increase of only 23 marks over the stock settings means that the small overclock did not do too much to affect performance.
Most Recent Comments
For an ATI card I am impressed with the performance!
I am not an ATI fan but that it pretty.
Nice review!
I am not an ATI fan but that it pretty.
Nice review!
Dunno about pretty
Pretty huge maybe?
Pretty huge maybe?
Pretty nasty point drop at high res in 3Dmark tbh
Ye which was strange as gaming it didn't do too badly. 3DMark I always take with a pinch of salt but it is a bit disappointing
UPDATE:
Sapphire have said that the retail version comes with 3DMark06 and more importantly 4 DVI outputs for a 4 monitor setup.
Pretty cool.
Sapphire have said that the retail version comes with 3DMark06 and more importantly 4 DVI outputs for a 4 monitor setup.
Pretty cool.
Good review, seems like a cool product, just a little late in the game. Hate to nit pick but on page 3 under Test Setup and Notes it says "To test these high-end nVidia cards I set a PC that gives as little of a bottleneck as possible." Again sorry to be annoying.
Oops
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Kempez'
UPDATE:
Sapphire have said that the retail version comes with 3DMark06 and more importantly 4 DVI outputs for a 4 monitor setup. Pretty cool. |
And 4 monitors on one card, thats pretty damn good!
But who uses 4 monitors!? :eh:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Toxcity'
But who uses 4 monitors!? :eh: |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='XMS'
Someone with 4 eyes?
|
The review is decent, as always.
Personally, I think the product is weak. It is dx9, overpriced (almost as much as a GTS but fails to perform as well, again, it is not dx10 either) stupidly large and... Almost pointless. IMO.
Look forward to seeing the HD2900XT
Would u think again if they have an inside inclin that Dx10 might not be with us til Q4.2008 ?
(not a fact, just speculation)
Still pricey imo, I`d still lean the 8800 way if I`m looking to spend around $350.
(not a fact, just speculation)
Still pricey imo, I`d still lean the 8800 way if I`m looking to spend around $350.
Wouldn't touch it with the 8800GTS 320mb beating it in benchmarks and having DX10. The only thing nVidia has to do to really put the grind into ATI is make SLI usable with 2 or more monitors. The dual GPU thing just doesn't do it, ATI needs to come out with DX10 GPU's, and make the cards smaller not bigger. If I were ATI and wanted to come out swinging against nVidia, that would be priority #2--- a smaller video card. Priority #1 would be making the GPU less power hungry while still making faster/powerful cores. With the AMD merger, I don't know whats keeping this from happening because they're pretty much giving up on a market they once ruled but are repeatedly losing sight of.
TJS
TJS
CSS Valid
link