Sapphire HD 2900 XT
Conclusion
Published: 9th July 2007 | Source: Sapphire | Price: |
The Sapphire HD 2900 XT is a nice card and the 2900 XT is, in my eyes, a good solid release from ATI/AMD. In our game tests the results were mixed with the ATI offering often beating the nVidia 8800's out of the door as regards FPS, especially in Oblivion. The HD2900 XT also showed it's colours in the Futuremark suite, scoring some nice numbers there.
However, one does wonder if it was enough to release a card that merely competed with nVidia's mid-high range cards. It's certainly left the market wide open, giving customers more choice, but has it given them motivation to buy an ATI branded product? I'm not so sure.
Looking at bundle and pricing, the card stands out here. With a great bundle for what you are paying it's sure to grab a few people's attention. The fantastic software on offer will tempt those looking for the complete bundle and at around £240ish (see recommended retailers below), you are getting decent value for money.
Although the 2900 XT has failed to grasp ultra high end enthusiasts there's still something there for people who want a nice card for their money. If you can ignore the slightly whiney fan it's worth taking into consideration. That in mind, we're giving it an "OC3D Recommended" award.
Pro's
+ Good solid performance
+ Cool running card
+ Great looking
+ Excellent bundle
+ Decent overclocking
Con's
- Only competes where perhaps it should have dominated
- Slightly whiney cooler
- 1 x 8 PIN PCI-e cable needed for safe overclocking
Thanks to Sapphire for supplying the review sample
Discuss in our Forums
Most Recent Comments
Ta mate
I would have tested HDMI but I don't have an HDMI TV/Monitor (yet). Still, I know HDCP works well
"Both nVidia cards are using the nVidia !!! 97.92 !!! Forceware drivers.
The ATI card was installed with the Catalyst Control Center 7.6's."
The latest oficial is 158.22 and the latest beta is 163 ... Can the reviewer repeat the tests with latest official if not beta drivers...I hate nvidia very much but the reviews must be fair..
Latest drivers VS latest drivers
7.6 official VS 158.22 official
Yes there would perhaps be a difference, but not to the extent it would skew the results.
I no longer have the 8800 GTS's as they are back with the manufacturers.
Hello Kempez.After 7.8 will be released is any chance to update the review.The AA performance has been improved radically.
When will they be out? These 7.7's look nice, but performance sucks.
I no longer have a 2900XT, and unfortunately I can't redo each review after every driver release, I have enough trouble reviewing the new stuff that comes in! :crazy:
Heh sorry mate :P..I think the reviews for a new VGA should be done after a couple of month..The trend is too early releases but with buggy drivers :(


On the quake4 test. Did you do a timedemo :confused: the results seem a bit 'wild'
All of the fps results are a bit wierd :) how do you get the avg fps etc?
edit: Once again I did three two minute runs on Quake 4 on each card and took the average of all my readings from these.
Sounds like a FRAPS type job? :(
The oblivion benchmark? is quite interesting.
On the hardware side, the cooler is quite nice :)
Shame about it being noisy :(
I thought the review was excellent. I really liked the beginning with the hardware images and little bits of info like the fan being noisy etc :)
I would be interested to see the HDMI capabilities of the card :)