Sapphire 4850x2 2GB PCIe Graphics Card

Test Setup & Overclocking

Test Setup

To ensure that all reviews on Overclock3D are fair, consistent and unbiased, a standard set of hardware and software is used whenever possible during the comparative testing of two or more products. The configurations used in this review can be seen below:

i7 Rig

CPU: Intel Nehalem i7 920 Skt1366 2.66GHz
Motherboard: Asus P6T Deluxe 'OC Palm'
Memory: 3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600mhz @ 8-8-8-24
HD : Hitachi Deskstar 7k160 7200rpm 80GB
GPU: ATI 4850x2 / Nvidia GTX280
Graphics Drivers: Cat 4.12 / GeForce 180.60
PSU: Gigabyte ODIN 1200w
 
During the testing of the setups above, special care was taken to ensure that the BIOS settings used matched whenever possible. A fresh install of Windows Vista was also used before the benchmarking began, with a full defrag of the hard drive once all the drivers and software were installed, preventing any possible performance issues due to leftover drivers from the previous motherboard installations. For the 3DMark and gaming tests a single card configuration was used.

To guarantee a broad range of results, the following benchmark utilities were used:
 
3D / Rendering Benchmarks
• Cinebench 10
• 3DMark 05
• 3DMark 06
• 3DMark Vantage

3D Games
• Crysis
• Far Cry 2
• Company of Heroes

• Race drive: GRID
• F.E.A.R
• Call of Duty IV
• Unreal Tournament III
• Quake IV


Power Consumption

Power consumption was measured at the socket using a plug-in mains power and energy monitor. Because of this the readings below are of the total system, not just the GPU. Idle readings were taken after 5 minutes in Windows. Load readings were taken during a run of Crysis.


As you can see above, the 4850x2 uses a lot more power than the GTX280 when idle but power usage evened out when both cards were put under load. The GTX however still appears to be the more greener of the two but bear in mind the ATI has two cores to the green teams one and it becomes clear who has the more power efficient setup.


Temperatures

Temperatures were taken at the factory clocked speed during idle in windows and after 10 minutes of running Furmark with settings maxed out (2560x1600 8xMSAA). Ambient temperatures were taken with a household thermometer. As we use an open test bench setup consideration should be given to the fact that the temperatures would likely increase further in a closed case environment.
 
 

Coming from a 3870x2 which was scorching at the best of times, I was surprised to see that the Sapphire 4850x2 ran as cool as it did. That said, with the fan set to auto the noise this thing makes is diabolical. It is easily the noisiest GPU in modern terms and is only beaten by the old 5800Ultra in terms of noise. Be sure to grab a decent set of headphones to drown out the whooshing of air.

Touching the card while under load it felt quite cool thanks to the aluminium frame. Only the VRM sink on the back of the card appeared to be hot. Surprisingly, little heat was being expelled via the rear of the card in contrast to the GTX280 which would serve as a good replacement for a household radiator.
 
 
Overclocking

Overclocking the Sapphire 4850x2 was very easy using the Catalyst Control Centre. However, the GPU and memory clocks were still being recorded incorrectly so I used the latest edition of GPU-Z to clarify the overclock and sure enough, the overclocked settings had been applied.

Stock Overclocked

A meagre 75mhz was applied to the core but I am certain that they could be pushed further as 700mhz was the maximum overclock CCC overdrive would allow us to apply on the GPU. We managed to nudge the memory a further 182mhz past stock before the card started to show signs of instability in 3DMark 06 with some textures being corrupt and some tearing apparent. The downside to the overclocking however was that with additional overclocks comes additional heat and as previously mentioned the fan speeds up to such an extent that it would be unbearable for day to day use without the use of headphones.

Let's move on to our suite of benchmarks where we pitch it up against Nvidia's finest, the GTX280...
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next»

Most Recent Comments

27-12-2008, 11:50:40

w3bbo
Two fans, two cores, two gigabytes of GDDR3. Will this be double trouble for Nvidia? Find out as we test ATI's latest GPU...

http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...201505893s.jpg

Read the full review HERE.

27-12-2008, 12:27:12

zak4994
Awesome card.

You should have also compared it to a Radeon HD 4870x2 to see the difference between the reds.

At 1600x1200, the GTX280 had double the frames of the 4850x2 in Crysis.

More driver problems?

27-12-2008, 12:34:56

SwaleSmith
Very intresting, can't beleive I'm saying this but the high end ATI cards especialy the 4870x2 are getting more and more tempting and with this card I guess once the drivers are ironed out its likely to be good.

The GTX295 so far hasn't impressed me much, I'd like to have seen a single card solution as in a sucessor to the GTX280 however it's somewhat unfair to jump to conclusions just yet.

So I we will wait and see but judging by the previous 9800 GX2 wich I owned but wasn't overly impressed by, I don't like the layout idea of two cards linked with an internal SLI connector....I'm sure you will be able to give us the low down on that soon enough though any dates on a review webbo???

Good Review

27-12-2008, 12:44:22

w3bbo
Due to it being the xmas period we won't have any GTX295's to report on just yet but as the impending release date is expected to be mid/late January I would expect to read a review around that time .

27-12-2008, 12:46:37

SwaleSmith
will keep an eye out

27-12-2008, 12:59:32

monkey7
Meh... Noisy, bad driver support (worse than ATi itself... WOW) and about equal performance to the gtx280. Not to mention the fact that 2 cores on one card are harder to custom cool with air.

I was once hoping to go 4850x2, but now the only option I would remotely consider is another 4850 or a gtx260 216.

EDIT: good review though ^^

27-12-2008, 15:33:08

SwaleSmith
Gotta say I have though many times about the 4870X2 but in my case I feel i'm better running my 2x GTX280's a little longer will see what happens over the first quarter of 2009 could be an intresting year for the GPU

27-12-2008, 15:40:11

w3bbo
I've got 2 x 280's (third on the way) and there is nothing I can't play at max res with all the goodies turned on.

27-12-2008, 15:50:35

fruityness
The price is the bad thing for this card. Ebuyers current pricing;

Sapphire HD 4850 X2 2GB GDDR3 Quad DVI HDTV Out PCI-E Graphics Card = 336

Sapphire HD 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 Dual DVI HDTV Out PCI-E Graphics Card = 379

For me it would be hard to buy the 4850x2 knowing that for 40 odd extra I could have the 4970x2. I mean, who would?

27-12-2008, 15:59:07

monkey7
People who need quad screen, but they would probably go for the good ol' 2x 4850 if they wanted real performance or with some strange quadro card supporting 16 monitors or so.

And indeed, every enthusiast which looks around himself will probably buy the '70x2

08-06-2009, 16:34:54

christoscob
i have this gpu is awsome with this ring

asus p5q deluxe

intel core 2 quad 2.66ghz

4GB ram ddr 2 800mhz

saphire 4850x2

08-06-2009, 18:28:09

rapidman17
Way to revive a dead thread....

Welcome to the forums though mate
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.