PowerColor R9 290 Review

Crysis 3

PowerColor R9 290 Review and Comparison

Crysis 3

Considering that there is only a handful of Stream Processors fewer on the PowerColor 290 when compared to the 290X, it's surprising that there is such a huge difference in performance when it comes the higher resolution test. At regular resolutions it's fine, but there is definitely a problem at 2560. 

 

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next»

Most Recent Comments

18-11-2013, 05:58:37

tinytomlogan
http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...095630715l.jpg

Following the R9 290X, it's time to take a look at its slightly reduced sibling, the 290.


Continue ReadingQuote

18-11-2013, 06:32:27

s13viper
Have to say, i'm pretty surprised by your results.

Its completely different to every single other review out there.

So i'm not really sure what to make of it.

edit : ill add i am now using 3x 290's....on water though and my results are insanely different (using 1 card of course)Quote

18-11-2013, 06:33:01

barnsley
Good Ol' PowerColor :'). Top lads for not being wimps. To be fair the performance is exactly what I would want for a card but no cooler means no sale for me.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.