ASUS GTX580 SLI Exclusive Review
3D Mark Vantage and Unigine
Published: 12th November 2010 | Source: Asus | Price: £404 - £808 |
3D Mark Vantage
At stock the GTX580 spanks the GTX480 pretty comprehensively, but even more impressive is how close the overclocked ASUS gets to the GTX480 in SLI.
Once we pair up the GTX580s though the scores go mental. 28145 3D Marks at the Extreme preset is mind-blowing. With a bit of extra time to tweak and some better cooling, 50K on the P-Score should be easy.
Unigine Heaven
0xAA
It's a similar story with Unigine. We never thought we'd see the day, at least so soon, when the GTX480 was made to look under-powered, but the ASUS GTX580 tramps all over it.
In SLI it's a little closer than it was in 3D Mark, but that's like saying that only getting 4 numbers on the lottery is closer to winning it than 3. It's still a long way behind.
8xAA
Once we push the Image Quality to its limits it's clear where the old GTX480 used to cry enough thanks to its inability to contain the heat, the GTX580 just keeps pounding out insane frame-rates.
In SLI we almost don't need to say anything here. The difference is clear. It's in a different league entirely.
Most Recent Comments
It is a shame that I bought 2x460 SLI - I should wait and buy 1x580 from Asus.
Did the performance dip down at all when you had it clocked up to 950MHz on the core at all?? If it didn't then the issue of the card throttling before any decent overclocking can be done is blown out the windows.
Does look like you had a poo poo Zotac though.
Oh yeah and the SLI scaling in Metro is pretty decent.
Reason I ask is because in the video for the Zotac it was disabled.
It's all getting rather confusing ay.
I know the card throttles if you use furmark or occt from logic in the card somewhere but I'm not sure what other throttling it'll do. Perhaps the furmark and occt are done on TDP while the rest of the throttling will come in to effect when the card gets too hot.
That would make sense as Nvidia did say that the throttling wouldn't effect gaming in the way it does the torture tests.
I don't bloody know, just theorising.
Anyway, it does show that a nice aftermarket cooler should allow some nice beefy overclocks that definitely have a decent effect on frame rates.
Here it is for the forum go-ers anyways
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJsdeD4m-M
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...buron/oc3d.jpg
Which is this
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../physxOFF1.jpg
Physx off. Physx on?
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...n/physxON1.jpg
The rolling benchmark looks completely different with Physx enabled mush.
Found another comparisson shot. Off
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../PhysxOFF2.jpg
On
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...n/PhysxON2.jpg
Doesn't matter really, but man, this game with Physx on is a sight to behold tbh. In the benchmark it's literally smoke and cobwebs. In the game? tiles smash, scenery breaks. Absolutely amazing stuff.
Ed. What I mean by doesn't matter.. In a benchmark as long as it's the same across the different hardware you are generating a comparisson. Those cards will absolutely eat Physx up any way
Edit. Again where are my manners. Thanks for the review chaps. Gives a man a chance to see how the rich and filthy live
Haha it's a good thing for you guys really. You have all the top end expensive stuff which makes me not want it as badly
but yeah nice cards, only if i had the money
though i still love my 460s
you need to get 2
lol


Continue Reading