Asus ENGTX275 896MB PCIe Graphics Card

Introduction

Introduction
 
ASUS The all conquering GTX280 has been around for quite some time now and has since been surpassed by the GTX285. Price however has always been the stumbling block for the GTX285 with many either opting to go the full hog and plump for an ATI4870x2 or drop down a notch to the GTX260. ATI exploited this gap in the market and filled it with the excellent HD4890 graphics card which for all intents and purposes performed extremely well and was very popular among enthusiasts but NVidia fans did not have this option until the GTX275 arrived on the scene.
 
The GTX275 is NVidia's answer to the ATI HD4890 plain and simple. It has been a rare occurance that both ATI and NVidia have openly squared up to one another, instead preffering to launch cards at strategic times striking blows from a distance. The mid range crown has been passed back and forth now for so long I am at a loss who now holds it, such has been to tug-o-war between the two manufacturers. Things changed however with the GTX275 and HD4890. Both cards were released within a month of each other and both cards were marketting themselves as the mid-high range card of choice. So which card should you choose and where should you hard earned cash go? We have already reviewed a number of HD4890 cards so instead I will be concentrating on todays review sample, the Asus ENGTX275. I will however be making strong comparisons to the cards biggest rival throughout the review.
 
The GTX275 nestles itself in between the GTX285 and GTX260 cards and for all intents and purposes have very similar processing units, all being based on the G200B core. The differences between the three are that the higher up the scale you go, the more stream processors, memory and rop counts you will get. All of which create an increase in the GPU's performance. Both the 285 and 275 GPU's have the benefit of a die shrunk core to 55nm, allowing higher clockspeeds but these speeds are still a far cry from the blistering speed of the ATI cards which are now hitting 1GHz as opposed to the AsusGTX275's core speed of 633MHz. Not only that but ATI are now using GDDR5 as standard but NVidia are sticking to the tried and tested GDDR3 for the time being. On the outset then, one could be forgiven for thinking the ATI 4890 is the much faster card. MHz and GHZ however are not the be all and end all of performance as we will find out...
 
 
Specification
 
The following specification was taken directly from the Asus product page:
 
Graphics Engine: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Bus Standard:
PCI Express 2.0
Video Memory:
DDR3 896MB
Engine Clock:
633 MHz
Shader Clock:
1404 MHz
Memory Clock:
2.268 GHz ( 1.134 GHz DDR3 )
Memory Interface:
448-bit
CRT Max Resolution:
2048 x 1536
DVI Max Resolution:
2560 x 1600
VGA Output:
Yes x 1 (via DVI to D-Sub adaptor x 1 )
DVI Output:
Yes x 2 (DVI-I)
HDMI Output:
Yes x 1 (via DVI to HDMI adaptor x 1 )
HDTV Output:
Yes
HDCP Support:
Yes
TV Output:
Yes (YPbPr to S-Video and Composite)
Adaptor/Cable bundled:
1 x DVI to D-Sub adaptor,1 x DVI to HDMI adaptor, 1 x HDTV-out cable, 1 x Power cable, 1 x S/PDIF cable
Software Bundled
ASUS Utilities & Driver
Dimensions:
4.376 inches x 10.5 inches
 
As you can see from the specification above, the Asus ENGTX275 is a reference, stock clocked GTX275.
 
Let's take a look at the package itself...
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

15-07-2009, 11:02:31

JN
"The GTX285 is an expensive card and the GTX260 is being left behind in the performance stakes. Do Asus have an answer to this quandry with the ENGTX275?" - by W3bbo

http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...122746687s.jpg

Asus ENGTX275 896MB PCIe Graphics Card

15-07-2009, 11:10:12

chudley
Funny what was said about the temps, but that was the first thing I thought about when I saw the pic.

Good review Webbo

15-07-2009, 12:08:27

VonBlade
I never understand why ATI cards have reasonably varied thermal solutions, but NVIDIA suppliers stick stubbornly to the rather average stock one.

I'd be very interested to know if the twin-fan Gainward provides more usable temperatures.

I'd also love to see a SLI 275 report. Rumour has it that a good clocked 275 can equal a 285, so 285 SLI performance for 300 would be exemplary.

Great review as always W3bbo.

15-07-2009, 12:21:08

Ducky Spud
Bought one of these about a week and half ago now and Im impressed with its performance. Mine runs pretty hot too (around mid 80's) which is limiting my overclocking but reassured as my limit is similar to what webbo was stuck at with it stock (i start getting artifacts when my cores at 690Mhz). Will try sticking some new thermal paste on there... will eventually be watercooling it tho

15-07-2009, 14:29:51

ali_james
Surely it's a sign of the times, where the cards heat sink is possibly designed with half an eye on limiting the overclocking potential of the card, thus swaying users to spend that little extra on the next model up for guaranteed clock speeds.

Either that or it is some very lazy work from both ATI and Nvidia to stick with fairly rubbish/loud stock heat sinks and even lazier work from their partners not to design and fit something better.

Very good review, and to be fair to Asus it's at exactly the right price point, dodgy cooler or not.

15-07-2009, 18:41:46

Rastalovich
Great review, good card, bad cooler for even the timid enthusiast.

nVidia would be well charged to put a fair bit of rnd into a better cooling solution when they release GT300.

Even since the 8800GT, the cards have been decent enough in their various guises, but very let down imo by the performance of the coolers. (even tho I personally like the look of them as a full-on black shroud) - and the sound levels are horrendous.

Another great write-up w3bbo.

I prefer these cards as a supposed mid-range+ purchase for people, throw in PhysX and Cuda.

I wonder if it's worth doing quality comparisons for cards these days as opposed to fps. Something along the lines of setting an fps level - if the card passes it it's 'passes', then add to that how many quality processing levels u can goto whilst still staying over an fps level. e.g. if ur card does 100+ fps in COD4, another card doing 110+ fps doesn't mean anything, but being able to stay there with 16aa++ (or whatever).

Wonder if the days of fps are coming to an end, unless Dx11's coding brings it back into the picture.

Quality over performance differences u'll never notice ?

28-12-2009, 06:02:06

JulietteKlonk
it is the best card i guess.
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.