Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Quad Core CPU

Synthetic CPU & Memory Results

Sisoft Sandra
 
SiSoftware Sandra (the System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is an information & diagnostic utility capable of benchmarking the performance of individual components inside a PC. Each of the benchmarks below were run a total of five times with the highest and lowest scores being discarded and an average being calculated from the remaining three.
 
Q9650 Sisoft Sandra
 
QX9650 Sisoft Sandra
 
QX9650 Sisoft Sandra
 
QX9650 Sisoft Sandra
 
QX9650 Sisoft Sandra
 
QX9650 Sisoft Sandra
 
While Sisoft Sandra results don't generally tend to have much of a bearing on real-world performance, the results for the QX9650 pretty much crush the rest of the chips used in this review. In both the CPU Arithmetic and Multimedia tests Sandra takes full advantage of the 12MB L2 cache and quad-core architecture of the QX9650, offering results at almost double of the slightly lower clocked dual-core E6850.
 
Memory Bandwidth results also see the QX9650 take a significant lead, with the Q6600 taking last place this time mostly due to its slower clock speed and the way Sandra calculates memory throughput.
 
 
PCMark Vantage
 
PCMark Vantage is the latest benchmarking suite from Futuremark. Differing significantly from their 3DMark suites, PCMark performs a series of benchmarks designed to recreate and benchmark scenarios of a PC being used for everyday tasks.  Vantage has a Vista only requirement as it actually relies on several different components from the OS in order to run correctly.
 
QX9650 - PCMark Vantage
 
The QX9650 flies ahead of both the Q6600 and E6850, beating them both by around 1000 points. Interestingly, the Q6600 and E6850 fight it out for second position despite the Q6600's two core advantage. This is quite possibly down to the brute-force performance of the E6850 with its 600mhz per-core advantage over the Q6600.
 
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

10-04-2008, 16:19:25

JN
"With a 3.0ghz stock clock, unlocked multiplier and a whopping 12mb cache, how does the QX9650 compare to some of it's more affordable counterparts?"

http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...215646766l.gif

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 ReviewQuote

10-04-2008, 16:20:40

ionicle
woah, one hell of a review!

its not even up on the front page yet

EDIT: good review

the dual core got left in the dust for multi-threaded aplications

but that processor isnt THAT much further ahead of the Q6600 tbh..

not really worth the extra ££ IMO

but as you said, the best of the best...Quote

10-04-2008, 16:25:47

Bungral
Wow.. Where did this come from..

Will read it in a min

Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.