Intel 980x Gulftown

Closer Look and Temperatures

Closer Look

Normally this is the part of CPU reviews that we dread. We all love a great picture of some sexy hardware but unlike every other hardware item, except perhaps storage, CPUs are as photogenic as Courtney Love? Thankfully in surprising twist we actually do have something great to show you because Intel have finally dispensed with the useless stock cooler that we've all been plagued with for years and moved into the Heatpipe Tower style of cooling that we all use anyway.

The CPU itself is a CPU. Very little to say. Externally it's identical to any other of the i7 family.

  

The New Cooler

Fortunately the new stock heatsink is vastly different. Although tower designs are very similar we were put in mind of the Arctic Cooling Freezer 7, which was a great little cooler so hopefully this one will perform well. I'm sure most of us who've brought a retail CPU have a box with an untouched stock cooler in it, so having one we'd actually consider using is a vast improvement.

The fan placement is slightly strange. Most, if not all, of the coolers we come across tunnel the air through the fins. Intel have decided to leave the fan exposed and have some of it pumping air across the heatpipes themselves. So it's a start, but not perfect.

        

On the left we can see a fairly robust mounting bracket which should provide more pressure than the standard push-pin style of former coolers.

On the right you can see the toggle switch that changes the fan from quiet to performance. 

        

One thing that hugely impressed us was the quality of the finish on the copper base. Very shiny indeed and it's not a fake "plated to look good" shine either but rather a very good smoothness. Without an electron microscope of course it's difficult to be precise, but we've seen many in our time and this is one of the finer ones.

    

Temperatures

The cooler actually performed very well especially considering it is still a stock cooler and only 92mm in size. As you can see below on the high settings it takes the edge nicely off the temperatures. However the primary difference does seem to be noise. WOW this thing is loud on high settings. Insanely so. Anyone who thinks the original 4870 or 8800 cooler was loud hasn't seen anything yet.

A tweak to the design to a shrouded fan that fully blows across the fins and not underneath will allow much lower RPM and hopefully noise. 

So the old stock coolers used to be loud and useless. This is a good cooler and still loud. Slowly but surely we're getting there. Unfortunately at the price point of this CPU I'd want Mr Otellini himself to install an all copper cooler personally so it's not without fault. 

      

I'm sure you're all as eager as we are to put this through its paces, so let's get down to some testing.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

04-03-2010, 19:14:44

tinytomlogan
OC3D loves a good cpu to play with, but is the 980x as good as we all hope?

Continue ReadingQuote

04-03-2010, 19:47:03

ppuff
Performs like a champ. It looks as though Intel will once again throw AMD under the bus with this one.Quote

04-03-2010, 20:42:03

VonBlade
Fantastic review Tom. Really enjoyable read.

Blimey that's a bit of kit. Dear Santa Quote

05-03-2010, 02:45:02

thestepster
looks like its lived up 2 the hype and its like u said its only the price thats the bad pointQuote

05-03-2010, 03:03:19

Runebeard
Dude I bloody love your analogies, "...it goes like an Essex girl on a Free WKD night." Man that cracked up

So wish I could afford to splurge on one of these, I wouldn't have to upgrade for tiiiiime.Quote

11-03-2010, 10:38:21

tinytomlogan
Its back!Quote

11-03-2010, 10:51:03

thestepster
ooh u got it back for more playin about Quote

11-03-2010, 14:53:29

killablade
God I want one of those 0.o Simply amazing!Quote

11-03-2010, 15:00:43

BloomerzUK
OT: Love the avatar Tom.Quote

11-03-2010, 16:00:30

BbBoS
Spectacular processor

Maybe with some ATI 5870's in crossfire, or Nvidia equivalents we could see 80 frames + from crysis Quote

12-03-2010, 02:01:08

JN
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='BloomerzUK'
OT: Love the avatar Tom.
w00t. it may be making an appearance elsewhere soon Quote

12-03-2010, 12:23:04

tinytomlogan
Yeah the OC3D Range Rover is in the sign shop as we speak! whooooopahQuote

12-03-2010, 12:55:08

mayhem
£850 est. come on guyes thats raly taking the .

No way will it be worth it buying it. and there is no way on earth any one here is going to need that much power except for good scores on test benches and braging rights wich means naff all in real world.

Thats like getting a car to compenswte for the fact you cannot be good in another department.

still good good review though but way out of my budget range and some thing ill never own unless OC3d are gving it away as a ""PRIZE"" hint hint ....lolQuote

12-03-2010, 16:44:26

cl0ck_ed
OMG, that looks like a BEAST, didn't think there would be such an improvement in gaming. The minimum FPS for crysis warhead are 216% better!! WOW.

Great review btw. Quote

16-03-2010, 09:42:40

Runebeard
Scan.co.uk have them on preorder for £882.74. Looks like I won't be getting one then as that takes up almost all my budget for my entire pc build xDQuote

16-03-2010, 10:34:11

FarFarAway
Looks hawt Tomster

Out of interest, did you manage to get a Super PI 1m at all? I just want to see some pwnage Quote

16-03-2010, 17:28:56

tinytomlogan
Super Pi doesnt utilise all the cores dude so that was one of the tests that we missed out as it wasnt a proper representation of the power the CPU had to offer.Quote

16-03-2010, 19:04:45

MikeEnIke
6 Cores is just insane. All on the same size chip.Quote

16-03-2010, 19:31:15

thestepster
well in memory of my grandad if i get enuff ill have gulftown and 58xx/fermi folding rockinQuote

17-03-2010, 05:46:45

Macon Paine
Looks awesome, performance is just incredible! Well done Intel, pity about the price though this thing costs about $1700 AUD. AMDs gonna need to pull a rabbit out of the hat with bulldozer.Quote

08-04-2010, 06:53:34

osshead
thanks for the check tom. i like your style of writing mate.Quote

08-04-2010, 11:47:43

alexhull24
Some serious power, I enjoyed the review tom. Cost is the problem here though, but this is always the case with bleeding edge hardware. Most of us have to wait for it to trickle down into our price range, which doesn't usually take long.Quote

08-04-2010, 13:32:51

killablade
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='alexhull24'
Some serious power, I enjoyed the review tom. Cost is the problem here though, but this is always the case with bleeding edge hardware. Most of us have to wait for it to trickle down into our price range, which doesn't usually take long.
It does for me, usually it never even happens xDQuote

10-04-2010, 07:28:05

Rastalovich
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='mayhem'
£850 est. come on guyes thats raly taking the .

No way will it be worth it buying it. and there is no way on earth any one here is going to need that much power except for good scores on test benches and braging rights wich means naff all in real world.

Thats like getting a car to compenswte for the fact you cannot be good in another department.

still good good review though but way out of my budget range and some thing ill never own unless OC3d are gving it away as a ""PRIZE"" hint hint ....lol
It's a real gimmick offering under that price tag, but it's subsequent spawnings will offer a cheaper alternative at a 'healthier' price. However healthy, they're going to exceed 4x pricing for some time.

6x cpus are allowing those at the top end of benchmarking to exploit their donations at this point. We've already seen this week Shamino cream the 3dMark Vantage record by some 5000 points with a single 'retail' GTX480 in one run, but my argument would be that with a 4x cpu, or his 6x with a 5870, would it only be a few thousand.

It's going to take a long time, imo, for these Intel offerings to calm down on the pricing stake. Maybe it'll take a really good AMD 8x to do it, but as far as extreme top-end cpus go for pricing, I can remember my QX9650 being priced at less than half of this.Quote

10-04-2010, 11:26:26

tinytomlogan
The QX9770 at launch was £900, its a given the top end CPU will cost a grand tbh.Quote

10-04-2010, 20:13:21

ppuff
Until the release of the 980x the i7 975 was $999 at my local shop, now its $799. I agree with Tom that almost all top ones seem to be 1K.Quote

11-04-2010, 08:44:11

Rastalovich
The QX9650 was the top cpu in it's time, and it wasn't £1k. The QX9770 has the unique privilege of being unofficially the top of it's socket forever and can still be retailed for £1k2.

If ur thinking 980x will remain the top cpu for these sockets forever, then u can appreciate it being £1k - but I somehow doubt that with Intel sticking with this socket set for a good few years to come, that the 980x will be the top end for it's duration.Quote

15-04-2010, 13:13:35

Nozbit
Alot of cash for a cpu but truly stunning performance for your money. Euro Millions will be getting played this weekend!Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.