Gigabyte X79S-UP5 Review
POV-Ray and F@H
Published: 21st September 2012 | Source: Gigabyte | Price: £240 |

POV-Ray
The Persistence Of Vision raytracer is heavily CPU dependant, as all rendering engines are. Overall the UP5 puts up a good showing, but it's clear from the average PPS that clock speed is king. This does neatly highlight the 'many ways to skin a cat'. The Xeon goes for lots of slow cores, whereas the i7 goes for a few really quick ones. The difference in per CPU performance is marked, yet the overall score is nearly the same.
Folding @ Home
There is no way to beat around the bush here, the UP5 is shockingly bad in F@H. Even with the 4.6GHz i7-3960X at its heart it gives us the lowest result we've seen. Lower than the stock CPU on the reference Intel board. It's as if the moment you have a heavy loading on the CPU the power phase gives up and chokes (if you'll pardon the pun) the life out of the CPU.
Most Recent Comments
at last: they fixed the niggles from its predecessor
if only i could get my hands on one of these, for next to nothing, i would be very happy
NOT!

I'm surprised gigabyte sent you 1 considering you already mentioned the bad v droop, they must of known you'd check that out
Back to the X79 Pro I guess. How did IT do with a hex-core Xeon?
- Sam
I always understood that SAS has a backward compability with SATA, so i guess you can use Mainstream SATA hd's on those SAS connectors!!
Making this mb achieve the total of 14 usable ports just like the asrock extreme11, am i wrong or should some testing be made?
|
Something i don't grasp about this review...
I always understood that SAS has a backward compability with SATA, so i guess you can use Mainstream SATA hd's on those SAS connectors!! Making this mb achieve the total of 14 usable ports just like the asrock extreme11, am i wrong or should some testing be made? |


The long awaited upgrade to the problematic X79-UD5 is finally upon us. Has the long gestation fixed the issues?
Continue Reading