Gigabyte X58A UD3R V2 Review
CineBench, POV-Ray, Unigine
Published: 8th November 2010 | Source: Gigabyte | Price: £149 |
CineBench R11.5
Maxons CineBench again shows how insanely close these two systems are. Even in OpenGL the results are pretty linear with clock speed. CPU Pts do show an increase with the UD3R gaining 10% over the Sabertooth.
POV-Ray
The freeware ray-tracing program POV-Ray replicates the CineBench results, with everything being linear to clock-speed except the UD3R v2 has the edge at stock in this particular test.
Unigine Heaven
Unigine is very GPU dependant and so we see fairly close scores across the board. Contrary to the CineBench and POV-Ray tests the stock UD3R is lagging behind here, but at both overclocked settings the Gigabyte board just shades the ASUS offering by half a frame or so.
Most Recent Comments
Fantastic stuff. I need not worry as if I ever go X58 then this is the board I shall get.
The original is an absolute legend and this one seems to make the design even better. And the price is sensational too.
This is the board that CPC gave a massively high score to saying that it made all of the models above it (in the Gigabyte range) redundant due to them being no better for functionality and that they came with loads of bolt on tat that didn't do anything.
The original is an absolute legend and this one seems to make the design even better. And the price is sensational too.
This is the board that CPC gave a massively high score to saying that it made all of the models above it (in the Gigabyte range) redundant due to them being no better for functionality and that they came with loads of bolt on tat that didn't do anything.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlienALX
Fantastic stuff. I need not worry as if I ever go X58 then this is the board I shall get. The original is an absolute legend and this one seems to make the design even better. And the price is sensational too. This is the board that CPC gave a massively high score to saying that it made all of the models above it (in the Gigabyte range) redundant due to them being no better for functionality and that they came with loads of bolt on tat that didn't do anything. |
Fair enough. But price to performance they are cutting their own throats. Let's say for example the 7 costs £300. Will it offer double the performance of the 3?
I look forward to it though and thanks for the review
I look forward to it though and thanks for the review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlienALX
Fair enough. But price to performance they are cutting their own throats. Let's say for example the 7 costs £300. Will it offer double the performance of the 3? I look forward to it though and thanks for the review |
I wish you didnt make another good review Tom as before this the choice for my new rig was clear : the sabertooth with I950 but now again I dont know what to get
Ps just joined the site but been reading reviews last couple weeks and really like what you guys are doing compared to most sites and for my new rig certainly couple decissions will be based on your reviews. THANKS
Ps just joined the site but been reading reviews last couple weeks and really like what you guys are doing compared to most sites and for my new rig certainly couple decissions will be based on your reviews. THANKS
Hey THD.
I guess it all depends on looks. Personally I think the Saber kicks the 3's butt when it comes to looks, but hey, performance can not be ignored.
The original UD3 won so many gold awards it would make your head spin. I don't like Gigabyte's colour schemes on their boards but hey, who effing cares when they kick so much ass?
I guess it all depends on looks. Personally I think the Saber kicks the 3's butt when it comes to looks, but hey, performance can not be ignored.
The original UD3 won so many gold awards it would make your head spin. I don't like Gigabyte's colour schemes on their boards but hey, who effing cares when they kick so much ass?
I'm not sure, found a pic with the sabertooth and my gigabyte below
but then again i would be bias some what
but then again i would be bias some what
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by THD
I wish you didnt make another good review Tom as before this the choice for my new rig was clear : the sabertooth with I950 but now again I dont know what to get Ps just joined the site but been reading reviews last couple weeks and really like what you guys are doing compared to most sites and for my new rig certainly couple decissions will be based on your reviews. THANKS |
Cheers,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kemical
I'm not sure, found a pic with the sabertooth and my gigabyte below but then again i would be bias some what ] |
Oh great another blue and white Gigabyte board.
Do you people not get tired?
Do you people not get tired?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xeno_Crux
Oh great another blue and white Gigabyte board. Do you people not get tired? |
Hi. How does the P6X58D-E compare with this board and the Sabertooth? I'm trying to decide between the 3. I know the P6X58D-E has 16 phase power, so maybe that would help with overclocking?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Nice board and layout but struggles with high OC's with regards to cold boot failures. I prefer the ASUS P6X58D-E and MSI X58A-GD65, especially the latter.
CSS Valid
Continue Reading