Gigabyte EX58-UD4P X58 Motherboard
Synthetic Memory Results
Published: 16th April 2009 | Source: Gigabyte | Price: £206.99 |
SiSoftware Sandra (the System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is an information & diagnostic utility capable of benchmarking the performance of individual components inside a PC. Each of the benchmarks below were run a total of five times with the highest and lowest scores being discarded and an average being calculated from the remaining three.
Everest is in many ways similar to Sisoft Sandra. Focusing mainly on software and hardware information reporting, Everest also comes with a benchmark utility suitable for testing the read, write and latency performance of the memory subsystem. Each of these benchmarks were performed a total of 5 times with the highest and lowest scores being discarded and an average calculated from the remaining three.
Results Analysis
Again, nothing startling from the UD4P scoring in the middle sector of the motherboards on test. The UD4P did however, get the best latency score so it remains to be seen if this has a positive effect on the other benchmarks I'll be running today.
Let's see how the boards perform in our Hard Drive benchmarks...
Again, nothing startling from the UD4P scoring in the middle sector of the motherboards on test. The UD4P did however, get the best latency score so it remains to be seen if this has a positive effect on the other benchmarks I'll be running today.
Let's see how the boards perform in our Hard Drive benchmarks...
Most Recent Comments
Orange? Orange!?
WTF man.
WTF man.
Lol i have the UD5 and its extreamly similar looking and believe me when i say its uglier in real life... Saying that i Picked up my UD5 from Novatech for like £205 for some reason that was the price so i clicked add to basket 
... The UD5 is a great board...
... The UD5 is a great board...Nice review 
The link from the front page is broken though :S
The link from the front page is broken though :S
Good review. Always enjoy reading ya mobo reviews.
Just a shame none are really pulling away from the pack. I'm sure on prevoius generations you would always get at least 1 or 2 that would be a little bit apart from the others.
Just a shame none are really pulling away from the pack. I'm sure on prevoius generations you would always get at least 1 or 2 that would be a little bit apart from the others.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Luigi'
Nice review
The link from the front page is broken though :S |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Jim'
Works fine here :\
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Bungral'
Good review. Always enjoy reading ya mobo reviews.
Just a shame none are really pulling away from the pack. I'm sure on prevoius generations you would always get at least 1 or 2 that would be a little bit apart from the others. |
Hopefully P55 won't be too far away so we can throw them into the mix.
Comments in the top right hand corner?
I think Gigabyte have done really well on the x58's, certainly catering for those on a budget...
I think Gigabyte have done really well on the x58's, certainly catering for those on a budget...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Luigi'
Comments in the top right hand corner?
I think Gigabyte have done really well on the x58's, certainly catering for those on a budget... |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='PeterStoba'
Nobody going i7 is on a budget
|
Think we're all a little harsh on the color scheme. Particularly as it's low score for slot coloring brings the average down to such an extent.
Got another of these gigabyte mobos on wednesday, and I'm getting more and more impressed with them the more I use them.
As a sidenote, I don't think we'll see P55.
Onboard stuff for these mobos across the spectrum could do with more scrutiny. The ALC889A seems to be a damn good audio setup in it's own right. A few design flaws for my liking, but for a 1 pc setup it's pretty impressive. Nics are offering teaming and carry with them some bios testing features.
The score for the presentation was not simply just for the slots but for the overall package. The gigabyte boards are not the best packaged boards in the world with the contents placed ontop of a cardboard divider. A thin sliver of foam is all that separates the motherboard base from the box itself. Compare this to the way Asus package there boards or indeed DFI and you can the appreciate why the Gigabyte score low in this department. It's saving grace are the included accessories.
Overall though I recommend it as it's the contents that matter and the UD4P certainly performs well enough and is priced such to earn the recommended award.
Overall though I recommend it as it's the contents that matter and the UD4P certainly performs well enough and is priced such to earn the recommended award.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='w3bbo'
The score for the presentation was not simply just for the slots but for the overall package. The gigabyte boards are not the best packaged boards in the world with the contents placed ontop of a cardboard divider. A thin sliver of foam is all that separates the motherboard base from the box itself. Compare this to the way Asus package there boards or indeed DFI and you can the appreciate why the Gigabyte score low in this department. It's saving grace are the included accessories.
Overall though I recommend it as it's the contents that matter and the UD4P certainly performs well enough and is priced such to earn the recommended award. |
Gotta be worth the extra 0.5 mark 
.
It also has an all in one heatsink via heatpipe
. It also has an all in one heatsink via heatpipe
CSS Valid
http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...132933275s.jpg
Read the full review HERE