Asus vs Gigabyte Intel H67 Review

Conclusion

Asus vs Gigabyte Intel H67 Shoot Out

Conclusion


Really, this review was a means for us to both showcase the GPU capabilities of the new Core i3/i5/i7 range as well as take a closer look at compatible motherboards from two of the world's most popular motherboard brands.

So what did we make of them?

In terms of performance, we were pleased by what the Core i5 2300 had to offer. On the basis that we expect to see this processor for around £130, it is good to know that the consumer will receive a little more grunt (than the Core i5 760) for a smaller outlay. The deal is sweetened for those who have minimal graphics requirements as the Sandy Bridge's Intel HD Graphics has little to no trouble at playing 1080p video and can even deal with a couple of games. We suspect that other popular hits such as Counterstrike Source/Half Life 2, Left 4 Dead and similar will run without much fuss at all.

As for the motherboards, it quite difficult to distinguish between the two. Both perform near identically, have suitable board layouts and are expected to be very durable for the long term thanks to their 8 phase power designs. The Asus P8H67M EVO tips the scales somewhat with its novice friendly EFI BIOS however there is little else to say.

The biggest problem with these motherboards in our eyes could well be price. At £120, these motherboards are priced at P67 territory as well as performance based equivalents from the AMD camp. If you plan on building a computer for under £500, it is hard to justify spending this level of money on either the P8H67M or H67MA-UD2H when it is possible to purchase a similar AMD Phenom II X4/X6 and a AMD 880G motherboard for considerably less. If there was any reason to select the new 1155 platform for a general media system, it would be for its excellent video transcode performance, which we will highlight in the future.

As far as both motherboards are concerned, they are solid products. From an engineering perspective, they are both well built and are likely to form a suitable platform for plenty of mainstream users. Competitively speaking they are also both evenly matched so if you are in the market for a motherboard on a brand new platform, then these are prime candidates. However the success of these boards will inevitably depend purely on their price tag.

Asus P8H67M EVO & Gigabyte H67MA-UD2H Motherboards


The Good
- Board Layout
- Performance
- Durability - 8 phase power reg + solid caps
- EFI BIOS (Asus)

The Mediocre
- Potentially Price

The Bad- None 

Thank you to Asus and Gigabyte for the boards on test here today, you can discuss your thoughts in the forums.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next»

Most Recent Comments

04-01-2011, 23:20:38

tinytomlogan
So you're looking to build an entry level Sandy Bridge computer; which H67 board will win?

Continue Reading

05-01-2011, 02:02:05

taz838
Grrr no overclocking, disgraceful little motherboard.

No integrated graphics for me then :'(

05-01-2011, 03:12:17

chudley
Co9uld it be possible that CPU OCing will be available via a bios upgrade with these boards?

05-01-2011, 03:18:34

Zeals
Quote:
Originally Posted by chudley View Post

Co9uld it be possible that CPU OCing will be available via a bios upgrade with these boards?
Doubt it, I think the H67 motherboards are aimed at people that don't know or want to overclock, so they will purchase the non "K" CPUs.

05-01-2011, 09:26:23

Rastalovich
I like the look of these (not just these two) for building pcs for other people.

The price may massage, but it all looks nice and handy to me.

05-01-2011, 10:37:28

benj3
A bit pricey imo for a board that is not going to appeal to basically the majority of the people with some knowledge of PC's apart from maybe people whom make/build PC's for customers. But still if I was building a computer for a simpleton whom only wanted to use it for internet/emails etc I would go with a cheaper board.

Edit*

Although saying that supporting GPU for a internet/email and some simple games user could completely eliminate the need to buy a graphics card which would save an extra £100ish but does it add up? £50 Mobo, £70 CPU & £80 GPU or £120 Mobo, £150 CPU £200 vs £270 for a everyday pc Ofcourse the sandybridge option will run smoother but is it worth the extra £70 :x!

18-01-2011, 09:11:10

VicVanGo
This review lists your test setup as using Mushkin Redline DDR3 @ 1333MHz but it looks like Mushkin Redline DDR3 is rated for 1600MHz. Is it possible to run the RAM at 1600MHz (or higher) on these boards? From what I have read, the H67 chipset can allow memory OCs but I haven't been able to tell if any of the mobo makers have allowed it yet.
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.