Asrock X58 Extreme3 Review

Conclusion

Asrock X58   Extreme3 Review

Conclusion

Oh dear. It all started off so well.

When we first received the Asrock Extreme3 in its shiny box we really we hoping this was the dawn of something special from Asrock. For a long time they've been holding the budget end of the market up with solid, if unspectacular, motherboards. So when we got this beast, all bristling with the latest technology yet at a sensible price, we really thought this could change the marketplace. Why pay £250+ for a high-end board if you can get one under a couple of hundred? Sadly the answer is all too clear. You can't get one under £200. Or at least not a good one.

Starting with the design. This seems to have been designed by two completely different teams of people. One of whom had a bunch of fantastic ideas and the other tossed parts in the air and soldered where they landed. The on/off and reset buttons have a real air of quality. The PCIe slots are nicely spaced apart allowing for good airflow in twin card systems. The relocation of the front panel header to next to the ATX24 makes for vastly easier cable management.

Unfortunately those good elements are bludgeoned by the terrible ones. Despite the southbridge not being part of the main heat dissipation via heat-pipe linkage, or even having either a large heatsink, the bottom right quarter of the board is very empty indeed. This space could so easily have been used to many of the parts that have been squished to the edges. The bottom edge of the board in particular is awash with pins and headers. The inclusion of a floppy header on a motherboard that supports 32nm Hex-Core i7s and USB3.0 is frankly ridiculous. Nobody should still be using floppies. Even Sony are about to stop making them. Equally bizarre is the inclusion of two legacy PCI slots. Sure one is understandable but two?

The appalling design doesn't stop there though. The placement of the SATA3 ports is equally ludicrous. To make room for the unnecessary IDE socket they have been placed, almost haphazardly, right in the centre of the board. Anyone fancy hot-swapping their drives? Thought not. The 8-pin CPU is nearly impossible to plug the power into unless your fingers are 10 inches long and have pipe-cleaner flexibility. And that's assuming you've already plugged the CPU Fan in, because otherwise it's not happening.

Finally the two most absolutely unforgivable aspects. The Northbridge/MOSFET cooler is so tall it has snow on the top. The fan is loud and whiny. Plus anything so overly large it requires the removal of the exhaust fan from the not-inconsiderably proportioned ACTS 840 is worthless. You'd be forgiven for thinking that it couldn't get any worse. And then you come to the sound.

For many years we've all owned external soundcards. From the humble Creative AWE32 and Turtle Beach efforts, a soundcard has been a must to move away from the beeps we were limited to. Then as time moved on they were important because on-board sound was so woeful. The Realtek ALC889 pretty much sorted all that out by being, for on-board sound at least, stupendous. So good is it that it's tough to find a motherboard that doesn't use it. Hello Asrock and the VIA 2020. The actual sound it produces your system is producing audio is alright. Nothing special. But it's the sound it makes when you're NOT that is the problem. It constantly squeaks and whines and produces all sorts of high-pitched nonsense. You can hear the mouse being moved. When running some of the tests such as 3D Mark it sounded exactly like the old cassette loading noise from the Spectrum and C64 days, or dial-up for those more modern of you.

With so many things wrong in a usability and design way, the actual testing results are almost secondary. It overclocked well enough, although the much advertised DDR3 2000 proved to be somewhat of a false dawn. We managed to test perfectly well at 4GHz and 1900MHz which sounds like quite a good overclock. In a lot of ways it was except the QPI voltage was near its 1.6v limit and it would still randomly freeze if you'd had the PC on for a long while. It worked well enough I'd call the overclock stable, and certainly didn't crash with any obvious pattern. So it's not the most reliable motherboard either.

The Instant Boot is brilliant. Make no mistake about it. Brilliant. The question is, when this is what you have, do you want to instantly boot?

There currently isn't a UK retail price available for the Asrock Extreme3, but judging from US retailers and the word floating around it is expected to come in at around £170 to £180. At that price it's not even the cheapest 333 motherboard, much less the cheapest X58. 

Pros
- The included software is excellent
- The BIOS pre-overclocked settings work well

Mediocre
- Elements of the board design
- The manual is poor
- Still using Floppy and IDE?
- SATA3 location

Cons
- Onboard sound is worse than useless
- Northbridge cooler is far too big

Sadly whilst the box is nice, the board isn't and so it takes a hammering on the presentation score. Despite it overclocking well, the sound is beyond awful and so the performance isn't too good either. Back to the drawing board for Asrock sadly.

The most irritating part is that with a more standard heat-pipe arrangement, some sensible moving of the parts around and culling the useless technology, and joining everyone else with a Realtek ALC889, this could be very good. But it isn't.

Thanks to Asrock for providing the Extreme3 for review. Discuss in our forums.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next»

Most Recent Comments

12-05-2010, 04:52:01

tinytomlogan
Asrock return to the high-end fold with a X58 333 motherboard. Does it cut the mustard?

Continue Reading

12-05-2010, 06:47:16

mayhem
What a excellent well thought out review.

I agree a floppy and IDE is a bit nuts. the ide i could live with just for moving across old stuff or to use some of the old 750 gigs i have lying around how ever the floppy . that got me scratching my head. Allso why do they have PS2 ports. they could have saved a few quid buy removing all this old gear.

I wasn't to fussed about placement of parts until you said about the small fan. oh dear me comes to mind here.

The sound OH MY OH MY OH MY .. squealing , electrical noise .. oh dear me a throw back to the early days of the first on board sound comes to mind. That is one hell of a major flaw esp since a hell of a lot of people now a days use on board sound. Something doesn't sound rite at all.

ASrock have all ways mixed old and new tech but if the old tech is a bad interference on the new tech then is it a worth while thing to do. All so i noted that the caps next to the ram slots are well to say the least unbelievably close to the ram slots does that cause any problems (just wondering). Ive seen ppl miss when placing ram in there slot and them caps look a little fragile. I could imagine them being ripped off by accident,

Ah well asrock nice try may be a ver 2 would be on the drawing boards pritty much straight away ....

p.s Love the Insta Boot if it works that well.

12-05-2010, 10:39:48

Steve-O-
Yea the big performance thing that caught me off guard was the 3DMark Vantage scores. There must be some serious things screwed up there. My Q6700 at 3.5ghz easily gets to 30k on performance for CPU. Why would a better CPU get less? This mobo seems to be one to stay away from.

I do like that instant on feature though. That's pretty cool to get into Windows so fast.

12-05-2010, 12:03:46

Diablo
The 3D mark scores you get are probably physx enhanced, which won't be the case for these scores. Mine will only hit 35K or so standard. Also, floppy drive, welcome to the 1990s?

12-05-2010, 13:24:28

BloomerzUK
Probably for people that still flash using floppy maybe?

12-05-2010, 14:52:50

Pitbull#2
Hmm I have used this for about 3 weeks Just to give it a shot and be fair.Its ALOT better than i thought . BUT how true that it cant hold the OC's without CRAZY voltages.:0.. soall and all if they had a few Minor tweeks IE. Board layout ect and Updayed the bios WAY more often then they do. I would have givein it a shot. As it sits I just Orderd the RAMPAGE 3 EX. because if you can find that in stock you wouldnt want anything else..lol. Asrock could go along way if promted to and Tried alittle harder.

12-05-2010, 15:15:56

Diablo
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='BloomerzUK'
Probably for people that still flash using floppy maybe?
Maybe, but I prefer flashing with USB drives, no worry about a skipped track or read error, which can happen on older FD. If they did a few tweaks with the layout, got rid of the legacy connectors, and maybe slashed the price it might be a better option. But with the P6T series around the price tag it seems just too much.

12-05-2010, 18:13:40

Steve-O-
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='Diablo'
The 3D mark scores you get are probably physx enhanced, which won't be the case for these scores. Mine will only hit 35K or so standard. Also, floppy drive, welcome to the 1990s?
What I was refering to was just the CPU score. Not the total score.

12-05-2010, 18:28:02

Diablo
Same, the CPU score is based on the physx score, which in your case is supplemented by the gpu having the physx offloaded. This is why the official benchmarks in the hall of fame don't have the physx enabled.
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.