AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE
Introduction
Published: 17th August 2009 | Source: AMD | Price: £185 |
As time has gone by, it’s become widely accepted that AMD’s 45nm processors have much to offer to a vast number of consumers. Starting from the runt of the pack, the Sempron 140 2.70GHz single core all the way to the bang per buck monster, the Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, the CPU manufacturer has aggressively pitched their processors against the entire Intel Celeron, Pentium and Core 2 range, often with lower price tags and/or higher clock-speeds. That's not all because there's also a cracking selection of motherboards from £40 to around £150, most of which sporting the infamous AMD SB710/750 southbridges, which can often unlock the cores of selected CPU's, unlock CPU Multipliers and unlock missing L3 cache. When you factor in that LGA775 will soon be as dead as a dodo and with AMD's plans to retain the same socket for future releases at least into 2011 (according to road maps), Socket AM3 CPU's have arguably become the #1 choice for all users barring the "extreme" performance enthusiasts.| Model | Clock Speed | L2 Cache | L3 Cache | Voltage | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition | 3.4GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.875 - 1.5v | 140w |
| Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition | 3.2GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.875 - 1.5v | 125w |
| Phenom II X4 945 | 3.0GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.85 - 1.25V | 95w |
| Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition | 3.0GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.875 - 1.5v | 125w |
| Phenom II X4 920 | 2.8GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.875 - 1.5v | 125w |
| Phenom II X4 910 | 2.6GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.875 - 1.425v | 95w |
| Phenom II X4 905e | 2.5GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.825 - 1.25v | 65w |
| Phenom II X4 900e | 2.4GHz | 2MB | 6MB | 0.850 - 1.25v | 65w |
| Phenom II X4 810 | 2.6GHz | 2MB | 4MB | 0.875 - 1.425v | 95w |
| Phenom II X4 805 | 2.5GHz | 2MB | 4MB | 0.875 - 1.425v | 95w |
ProcessorsAMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition 3.2GHz
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.4GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte MA770T-UD3P
Cooling
OCZ Gladiator MAX
Memory
4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1333 Corsair Dominator
Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX260 896MB
Hard Disk Drive
500GB Maxtor DiamondMax 22 (SATA 3Gb/s)
Power Supply
Tuniq Ensemble 1200w
Graphics Drivers
Geforce WHQL 190.38
Operating System
Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 (x64)
Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz
Motherboards
Biostar TPower X58A
Cooling
OCZ Gladiator MAX
Memory
6GB (3x2GB) DDR3-1333 Corsair Dominator
Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX260 896MB
Hard Disk Drive
500GB Maxtor DiamondMax 22 (SATA 3Gb/s)
Power Supply
Tuniq Ensemble 1200w
Graphics Drivers
Geforce WHQL 190.38
Operating System
Windows VIsta Ultimate SP2 (x64)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz
Motherboards
ASUS ROG Maximus II Gene P45
Cooling
OCZ Gladiator MAX
Memory
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-1066 Buffalo Firestix
Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX260 896MB
Hard Disk Drive
500GB Maxtor DiamondMax 22 (SATA 3Gb/s)
Power Supply
Tuniq Ensemble 1200w
Graphics Drivers
Geforce WHQL 190.38
Operating System
Windows VIsta Ultimate SP2 (x64)
Most Recent Comments
Good review :)
Nice review all though the cpu is not just yet my cup of tee, how ever i will sing a song of Boom Boom Boom Let me way Eh Oh !!!!!! Or was it just a fizz and pop when it blew :D
nice to see you pushing it to its own demise .. are you going to get a new sample to play with.
nice to see you pushing it to its own demise .. are you going to get a new sample to play with.
Really hoping so as 4.1GHz felt achievable even on the basic Gigabyte board that was used. Even more interesting than the max oc will be what results it gets at 4-4.1ghz
Not that it'd obviously stake any claims to outperform anything, but mentioning a Q9550 - that would have been nice. And a X48 DDR3 sporting mobo too, atleast a P45 DDR3 - particularly when emphasis is made on artificial benchmarks.
I personally see 775 as still a viable option.
Quick question though.. How can this be mentioned in the conclusion good and bad bit without actually testing said CPU against it?:
"Comfortably outperforms it's comparatively priced rival, the Core 2 Quad Q9550."
Would have been good to see it pitched against a proccy like that though as Rast said.

[IMG]http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/articles/2009/08/17100531915l.jpg[/IMG]
[B][B]AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE[/B][/B]