Tuniq TX-2 Thermal Paste

Packaging and Contents

Search Reviews

Packaging and Contents

The packaging that Tuniq has chosen to run with for their TX-2 thermal paste is simple and unassuming to say the least, but provides a little more than the OEM versions of AS5. The TX-2 thermal paste is packaged in a heat-sealed plastic bag with the product name on the front, and the TX-2's specifications on the rear.

Tuniq TX-2 packaging_front Tuniq TX-2 packaging_rear
TX-2 front package TX-2 rear package
 
Present and accounted for is one 3.5g syringe of Tuniq TX-2 thermal paste. Let's have a look at the contents a little closer...


Contents and A Closer Look

The single syringe of TX-2 thermal paste features the name on the front...just in case you forget, and the specifications again on the rear. One thing I like about the Tuniq TX-2 syringe applicator is that you feel like you are getting considerably more for your money, and it's a little easier to hold and control.

TX-2 syringe_front TX-2 syringe_rear

The syringe also has a neat little window so you can see how much more thermal paste you have left.

TX-2 thermal paste window

The size difference between Arctic Silver's AS5 and Tuniq's TX-2 thermal paste syringes is really quite evident, even though they hold exactly the same amount of product.

AS5 versus TX-2

I have included a closeup of both pastes just so you can see the difference between the two.

AS5 syringe Tuniq TX-2
 
You can see from the images above that the TX-2 is by far the less viscous of the two thermal pastes, which definitely makes the application considerably easier. Personally, I apply a small amount to the centre of the processor and then massage it around with my finger inserted into a plastic bag. I found that the TX-2 thermal paste was easier to apply when using this method due to its lower viscosity.

It is interesting to note that Tuniq don't include a prefered way of applying the thermal paste on their website,  nor is it included on the packaging. Furthermore, I found it odd that Tuniq doesn't recommend a curing time for TX-2 either.

Let's head over the page to see how the testing will be conducted...
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next»

Most Recent Comments

01-10-2007, 06:56:11

Toxcity
Just another attempt by AMD to sell cards? What do you think?

News Article.

01-10-2007, 07:11:37

Mr. Smith
A poor attempt at that.

Heatpipes ftl

01-10-2007, 12:00:31

Nagaru
I am sorry, but I fail to see the difference between this and the standard card.

01-10-2007, 12:03:19

Ham
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='Nagaru'
I am sorry, but I fail to see the difference between this and the standard card.
Me either, but i an't sorry about it.

If AMD want to sell them then they need to cut the price by £70-100. Not stick a differeent hs on.

01-10-2007, 12:11:39

ichiban
is the GT lower than the Pro in terms of performance?

01-10-2007, 12:46:28

Mr. Smith
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='ichiban'
is the GT lower than the Pro in terms of performance?
Article says... Yes.
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology news, reviews and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE and you can unsubscribe at any time by sending a blank email to newsletter-unsubscribe@overclock3d.net.

Simply enter your email address in the box below and be sure to follow the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums or at one of the addresses on our Contact Us page.