Thermalright Ultra-90 K8
Conclusion
Published: 4th May 2006 | Source: Jab-Tech | Price: |
Author: Nicholas Sarpolis (NickS)
Hardware Acquired: Jab-Tech
Conclusion
The Ultra-90 shined when a more intense heat load was applied, showing what more heatpipes can really do when running an overclocked CPU. Despite lacking the features of the XP-90 like cooling surrounding motherboard components, the Ultra-90 still manages to get by, and keep's the CPU a full 2ºC cooler when overclocked.
Overall the heatsink is a great buy. Price vs. performance ratio is great. Paired with the 30 dBa Panaflo, it makes for a quiet, and effective cooling solution on any budget, for almost any socket.
Pro's
Good Performance
Quiet Operation
Uses stock AMD mounting system
Great Price
Light Weight
Con's
Doesn't cool surrounding components
Difficult mounting system
A special thank's goes out from OC3D to Jab-Tech, for providing OC3D with this magnificent product to review!
Discuss this review in our forums...
Most Recent Comments
Not too bad. However, this review seemed fairly laid back or something, much more casual. Not necessarily a bad thing. Also, when talking about test setup and method, you should say how long you let it sit for idle and load. I know you photoed that into your screenshots, but I prefer it all being stated before the testing screenies. That's personal preference though. Besides that, nice job 
Edit: Upon a more thorough reading, I'm sorry to say I've come to dislike it
You misspelled necessarily and necessary. I really feel you should spell out everything fully instead of using all of those abbreviations. You should have capitalized Ballistix. The overall organization seemed off and it just doesn't seem to flow. This is not a flame or anything of the sort. I just have a bit of a habit of stating things very bluntly.

Edit: Upon a more thorough reading, I'm sorry to say I've come to dislike it
You misspelled necessarily and necessary. I really feel you should spell out everything fully instead of using all of those abbreviations. You should have capitalized Ballistix. The overall organization seemed off and it just doesn't seem to flow. This is not a flame or anything of the sort. I just have a bit of a habit of stating things very bluntly.I'm going to have to agree... The review only took a couple of hours for Nick to fully test and complete, doesn't seem long enough to be a solid official review.
Review taken down for a bit of moderation. Will be back later.
i dont think its too bad, idle and load times are shown nicely in a graph 

I think I corrected it all, and I re-enabled it. Take a look 
Nick

Nick
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NickS
I think I corrected it all, and I re-enabled it. Take a look
![]() Nick |
ill look at it again when I get home.
Looks good to me 

Woohoo.
Sorry about before guys, really. Yesterday I was really tired, and I know that's no excuse, but I guess I was getting a bit frustrated too.
I'll try to keep them up to par from now on, and if I become tired/frustrated I'll stop and continue later on.
Nick
Sorry about before guys, really. Yesterday I was really tired, and I know that's no excuse, but I guess I was getting a bit frustrated too.I'll try to keep them up to par from now on, and if I become tired/frustrated I'll stop and continue later on.
Nick
Alrighty guys, I edited it AGAIN. The first time I was at school, in my CAD class
.
I'm at home now and IMO it came out 10x better
Nick
.I'm at home now and IMO it came out 10x better

Nick
I'll check it out in the morning mate 
I think what we should ALL of us reviewers should do from now on is get another member of the review team to read the review over before it goes live.

I think what we should ALL of us reviewers should do from now on is get another member of the review team to read the review over before it goes live.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='XMS'
I think what we should ALL of us reviewers should do from now on is get another member of the review team to read the review over before it goes live.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XMS
I'll check it out in the morning mate
![]() I think what we should ALL of us reviewers should do from now on is get another member of the review team to read the review over before it goes live. |
(yep, he checks all my news for the most part)Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='WC Annihilus'
That's why I have Kemp look over ALL of my work (well, when he's available) before it goes live
(yep, he checks all my news for the most part) |

Hey, who killed the thread title btw?
Nick
Nick
Eh?
It may have been me but not on purpose - I do tend to click on the titles randomly and its sooo easy to change them by mistake with this VB
It may have been me but not on purpose - I do tend to click on the titles randomly and its sooo easy to change them by mistake with this VB

Haha, ya I had been wondering about that. So you got your happy XP-90 installed with the bolt-through? (I noticed you asking about that on XS)
lol ya know I'm going to set myself as hidden on teh forums I can, you're scaring me.
Nick
Nick
have been using the ultra90 for some time now and have mostly good to say about it.
the only downside i have encountered is i cant install/remove the psu with it in as i could with a zalman 7000b but as it uses the standard retention bracket its very easy to remove and install.
another downside is its quite high so might not fit into smaller cases but fits just fine in my antec sonata case.
its so big and so efficient im sure i could run it without any fan at all.
have a 90mm everflow on it at the moment and it pushes 30cfm at 1350rpm and cools the cpu to 41c and expect it to drop alittle as the as5 is less than 4 hours old.
also the ultra90 has been discontinued and replaced with a ultra90a which is slightly smaller, 7mm to be exact to be compatible with more cases and is supposed to performe the same.
the only downside i have encountered is i cant install/remove the psu with it in as i could with a zalman 7000b but as it uses the standard retention bracket its very easy to remove and install.
another downside is its quite high so might not fit into smaller cases but fits just fine in my antec sonata case.
its so big and so efficient im sure i could run it without any fan at all.
have a 90mm everflow on it at the moment and it pushes 30cfm at 1350rpm and cools the cpu to 41c and expect it to drop alittle as the as5 is less than 4 hours old.
also the ultra90 has been discontinued and replaced with a ultra90a which is slightly smaller, 7mm to be exact to be compatible with more cases and is supposed to performe the same.

Check it out here.
Feel free to post comments, quesitons, suggestions, etc.
Also, the contest winner gets a FREE, brand new, Panaflo M1A 92MM fan.