Fluid XP+ HP Watercooling Fluid

Testing & Results

Performance Testing

First and foremost I was interested to see if Fluid XP+ actually provided any cooling advantages over standard de-ionised water. In case you didn't already know, the thermal properties of water are extremely hard to beat, and in all honesty I only know of a few fluids that have any marginal advantage over water. The test machine specification can be seen below:

Test Setup:
CPU: Intel Core2Duo E6700 Retail @ 3.8ghz (1.6v)
Water Block: Danger Den Maze 4
Pump: Laing D5
Radiator: XSPC R120D


In the interest of a fair comparision the watercooling loop was flushed with water and left to dry over night in-between testing the de-ionised water and Fluid XP+. In addition to this, the water block was not removed from the CPU at any point thus preventing any variation in temperature due to re-mounting.

De-Ionised Water Results Fluid XP+ Results

After taking the difference in ambient temperature out of the equation, the performance difference between Fluid XP+ and de-ionised water was 0oc. This could be seen as disappointing, but what you need to remember is that Fluid XP+ is giving you the same performance benefits of untreated de-ionised water without the algae and corrosion issues.


Conductivity Testing

We've all heard the horror stories of peoples water cooling systems cracking, splitting and generally spewing highly conductive water over thousands of pounds worth of components. This is why most people avoid putting together their own water loops, and instead favor the pre-built systems. As Fluid XP+ is non-conductive this should be a problem of the past. But lets run some tests of our own to see exactly what happens when Fluid XP+ comes into contact with electricity.

The method for testing conductivity is simple: We will be taking an LCD screen, powering it up and submerging it in a container of Fluid XP+.

Click HERE for the video (5.1mb).

While Fluid XP+ did not cause any damage to the submerged LCD screen it did indeed cause the screen to power off. This would imply that although Fluid XP+ is not conductive enough to kill components it still has the ability to short circuit them, temporarily causing problems.

«Prev 1 2 3 Next»

Most Recent Comments

15-01-2007, 05:37:59

JN
"Fluid XP+ may have been around for some time but today we've been given an oportunity to test its thermal properties and conductivity. Is it worth its hefty price tag? We find out."

LinkQuote

15-01-2007, 06:13:58

Dav0s
i dont think its worth all that money just for the cleanliness, it didnt make any difference at all to temps. I know its a pain but id rather clean out the loop every couple of weeks than pay £30 a time for some XP

nice writeup mateQuote

15-01-2007, 06:15:16

JN
Quote:
Originally Posted by name='Dav0s'
i dont think its worth all that money just for the cleanliness, it didnt make any difference at all to temps. I know its a pain but id rather clean out the loop every couple of weeks than pay £30 a time for some XP

nice writeup mate
The low conductivity is where it's at tho. Plus u won't get temps lower than plain water really (unless you wanna pump liquid metal).

But ye- its expensive fo sure.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.