Cooler Master Hyper Z600 CPU Cooler
Packaging & Appearance
Published: 11th September 2008 | Source: CoolerMaster | Price: £36.41 |
Packaging
The front of the box of the Z600 is fairly plain, but rather eye catching. There is a glossy cut out of the cooler attached in the centre, so that it is raised from the rest of the box, with a black outer glow surrounding the edges. It also features the Cooler Master Logo and product name.
The remainder of the box contains product details, specifications and shows a few images of the cooler in action.
Once inside the outer shell, you are presented with the internal packaging. This consists of two main pieces that split apart leaving the cooler in the middle. There is foam padding inside each compartment, protecting the cooler from damage during transit.
All of the accessories are concealed neatly in the end of the large compartment and pulling up the edge reveals two plastic re-sealable bags containing all the accessories. Inside there is a warranty slip, fan mounts, mounts for sockets AM2 & 775 and a nut/screw thread used for attaching the cooler to the motherboard with the supplied screws.
The front of the box of the Z600 is fairly plain, but rather eye catching. There is a glossy cut out of the cooler attached in the centre, so that it is raised from the rest of the box, with a black outer glow surrounding the edges. It also features the Cooler Master Logo and product name.
Appearance
When you first set your eyes upon the cooler you are immediately amazed by the size of the thing. To put it simply, it is HUGE. Upon removing it from the packaging you also notice another thing - weight. The thing weighs a ton, and is incredibly solidly built. The fins are solid, and do not bend easily, and the base is nicely finished and smooth.
Comparing the Z600 to the stock Intel cooler, you get a very good idea for size; the stock cooler is just above the height where the fins on the Z600 start. Talking of heatpipes, you may also notice that the Z600 has a fair few of them - 6 in total.
When you first set your eyes upon the cooler you are immediately amazed by the size of the thing. To put it simply, it is HUGE. Upon removing it from the packaging you also notice another thing - weight. The thing weighs a ton, and is incredibly solidly built. The fins are solid, and do not bend easily, and the base is nicely finished and smooth.
Comparing the Z600 to the stock Intel cooler, you get a very good idea for size; the stock cooler is just above the height where the fins on the Z600 start. Talking of heatpipes, you may also notice that the Z600 has a fair few of them - 6 in total.
The Z600 uses two different fin sizes, using an alternating pattern down the cooler, and then smaller fins at the bottom to give clearance above the motherboard and VRM’s. You will also notice the ridges in the fins; this is for attaching fans using the supplied plates.
Most Recent Comments
Cheers Jim, Brings warmth to your heart seeing it up there live!
A big thanks goes to yourself and the whole OC3D team as well, top chaps!
A big thanks goes to yourself and the whole OC3D team as well, top chaps!
Could you give temps with the two fans attached @ 1.4v?
Haven't gotten a chance to read through it yet, but something to mention is that on the graphs themselves the stock ones should explicitly say it was run passive and the OC'ed ones should explicitly say run with fans. Tons of people who look up cooler reviews only look at the graphs and don't actually read any of the review itself.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Nick R'
Could you give temps with the two fans attached @ 1.4v?
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='WC Annihilus'
Haven't gotten a chance to read through it yet, but something to mention is that on the graphs themselves the stock ones should explicitly say it was run passive and the OC'ed ones should explicitly say run with fans. Tons of people who look up cooler reviews only look at the graphs and don't actually read any of the review itself.
|
I misread the latter text and thought that it was still passive when OCed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Nick R'
I misread the latter text and thought that it was still passive when OCed.
|
very nice review
well written
good item
decent price
good performance
well written

good item
decent price
good performance

It looks a bit like a cross shaped version of the Scythe Ninja.
Great review, but, should the passive cooling test last for a bit longer, because even with the best heatsink in the world, over time the fins would heat up and the temperature of the processor would increase. Maybe if you had a time vs. temperature for the cooler it would be helpful.
On another point, would this handle the QX9770 (at 4.0 ghz), I move my computer far too much to want to water cool it, so I need decent air cooling. I'm getting idles of 51, 52, 36, 41 and loads (after 20 mins of cpu burn at 100% cpu usage) of 59, 57, 58, 61
On another point, would this handle the QX9770 (at 4.0 ghz), I move my computer far too much to want to water cool it, so I need decent air cooling. I'm getting idles of 51, 52, 36, 41 and loads (after 20 mins of cpu burn at 100% cpu usage) of 59, 57, 58, 61
If you put fans on it, I would expect it to handle that quite easily, Especially if your current cooler is....
If we tested for an hour, there would be someone who would say 2, and so on. At the end of the day, 15 minutes is enough IMO
If we tested for an hour, there would be someone who would say 2, and so on. At the end of the day, 15 minutes is enough IMO
Fair enough, if the results are very similar across that time, it would still be nice to see some time vs. temperature graphs. Great review though.
Also, a quick remount later, turned out the thermal paste hadn't spread properly, was a sort of thick layer on the middle, bit of scraping out solved everything. Now in the mid 40-s for 1 and 2 and low 40s for 3 and 4.
Also, a quick remount later, turned out the thermal paste hadn't spread properly, was a sort of thick layer on the middle, bit of scraping out solved everything. Now in the mid 40-s for 1 and 2 and low 40s for 3 and 4.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='Diablo'
Fair enough, if the results are very similar across that time, it would still be nice to see some time vs. temperature graphs. Great review though.
Also, a quick remount later, turned out the thermal paste hadn't spread properly, was a sort of thick layer on the middle, bit of scraping out solved everything. Now in the mid 40-s for 1 and 2 and low 40s for 3 and 4. |
Sorry, to clarify, i thought your review was done very thoroughly, when I remounted my cooler, the temps dropped. Sorry for the confusion!















"Cooler Master have made some bold claims about their new Z600 cooler. We put the Z600 to the test to find out if it can really live up to the hype."
http://www.overclock3d.net/gfx/artic...205952745s.jpg
Cooler Master Hyper Z600 CPU Cooler