Vista Successor: Codename Fiji?
"The next version of Windows (after Vista) has been announced. Codenamed Fiji it may turn into a minor update to Vista or a fully fledged OS. Read on to find out more...
Published: 15th December 2006 | Source: ZDNet.com |
Even though more and more teams at Microsoft seem to be shying away from christening their fledgling products with good, old-fashioned code names – favoring the ever-so-boring “V.Next” designation instead — there are still some who are doing so.
Best guess on what it is: Fiji is "the next version of Windows" following Windows Vista and preceeding Windows "Vienna" (the version of Windows formerly code-named "Blackcomb"). Some people say Fiji will take the form of Windows Vista Service Pack (SP) 1. Others believe it will be a full-fledged, but relatively minor, Windows release — more of a Vista R2.
Microsoft won't comment publicly on the code name at all. Meaning/context of the code name: Fiji,is part of Microsoft's vista (with a lower-case V) series. When Microsoft officials acknowledged the decision to change the Windows Blackcomb name to Windows Vienna, they said to expect other products to be part of the "beautiful vistas" line. Some of the "vistas" are cities; others seem to be countries.
For the past few years, Microsoft's plan of record has been to release a new version of Windows client and a new version of Windows Server every two years. The thinking in Redmond: Stagger releases of more minor, interim (R2-style) updates with major, full-fledged ones. If the new Windows development organization under Steven Sinofsky sticks with this plan, Fiji should be out around 2008. If Fiji is simply the code name for Windows Vista SP1, it should be out by the end of 2007, right around the same time as Longhorn Server.
Fiji raises an interesting question: What counts as an operating system? Going forward, will service packs/roll-ups count, in Microsoft's, partners' and customers' eyes, as new versions of products? (That's what Windows XP Service Pack 2 was, after all.) Or will Microsoft try to get company watchers to consider SPs the equivalent of new Os releases, in order to appear to be more agile in its development?
Feel free to comment on this news article in our forum