ATIs 55nm Next Gen GPUs
"55nm R680, RV660/670, RV635 & RV620 In Q4 2007"
Published: 8th June 2007 | Source: VR-Zone |
55nm R680, RV660/670, RV635 & RV620 In Q4 2007
According to our source, AMD's latest roadmap hints at all next-generation GPU's being based upon a 55nm process.
One initial question pops into mind though...why the weird node size?
Discuss in our forum
Most Recent Comments
I would personally go for tygon but that's just on looks ;)
No I wouldnt bother with a Y piece, you will not be gaining as much as if you had the 2nd rad after the first block
No I wouldnt bother with a Y piece, you will not be gaining as much as if you had the 2nd rad after the first block
Cant you do a double loop? I would go for tygon it has very thick walls.
Rob
Rob
dont know if i could do a double loop will have to check what space i have left after the first one but maybe could be a possibility thanks
and to llwyd do you mean
reservoir to pump
pump to cpu
cpu to twin rad
twin rad to gpu's
gpu's to triple rad
then back to the rervoir
and to llwyd do you mean
reservoir to pump
pump to cpu
cpu to twin rad
twin rad to gpu's
gpu's to triple rad
then back to the rervoir
Res > Pump > 120.3 > CPU > 120.2 > gpu > gpu > res tbh
I really doubt you will see any performance increase by adding a third rad as your flow will just die completely
I really doubt you will see any performance increase by adding a third rad as your flow will just die completely
if it was me id go
Pump > Res > Cpu > 120.2 > Gpu > 120.3> Pump
if you have room for a 3rd rad then get a 2nd pump instead as the increase in flow will give more than another rad
Pump > Res > Cpu > 120.2 > Gpu > 120.3> Pump
if you have room for a 3rd rad then get a 2nd pump instead as the increase in flow will give more than another rad
CSS Valid
system so far:
xspc res
D5 vario
pa120.2
D-tek fuzion
2x EK 8800gtx Delrin
pa120.3 then back to res
also would it be worth splitting the tube from the first rad with a Y or T peice to go to the cpu and gpus then joining it to go to the 2nd rad