NVIDIA's MCP68 Board: The Counter Punch To AMD's 690G Chipset
"NVIDIA is going to launch their MCP68 board over at CeBIT to compete against AMD's 690G chipset."
Published: 28th February 2007 | Source: VR-Zone |
News <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ufo1.com/ad/c.js"></script> Posted 28/02/07
Author: PV5150
Source: VR-Zone
According to our source, Nvidia are preparing their counter punch against AMD's 690G chipset in the form of their new MCP68 based board. VR-Zone's source, PCpop has apparently received some information from OEM manufacturer, CTHIM on their latest ZM-NC68-L board based on MCP68V chipset (NF-7050-630A) that uses GeForce 7050 graphics core supporting DX9 and SM3.0.
| This board comes with a PCIe x16 slot for discrete graphics card. There will be 2 SKUs, MC68PV for the high end and MCP68S for the value to compete against 690G and 690V respectively. Its successor MCP 78 will support DX10. |
Feel free to discuss in our forum
Most Recent Comments
Pfft, so many years time they`ll be £50, if they`re still about.
I can remember the 100s they wanted for the first 2x cdroms.
Milk it.
I can remember the 100s they wanted for the first 2x cdroms.
Milk it.
Blooray?! ;)
hd dvd ftw
It was a direct quote, not my misspelling if that's what you were hinting at! I managed to spell it correctly in the article title ;)Blooray?! ;)
Pfft, so many years time they`ll be £50, if they`re still about.
I can remember the 100s they wanted for the first 2x cdroms.
Milk it.
showing your age there mate :p i remember buying my first 1x dvd writer, £250 i paid! now look at them. (on a side note, its still going strong, good ol pioneer!)
i think blu-ray has much potential, h/e if sony wants to succeed they still needs to bring the prices down..... 599-499 for a freakin player is ridiculous, i think we all know that a blue laser costs more h/e the ratio is better for hd dvd atm.
Im still yet to buy a dvd-rw...
They seem to have noticed it, and fixed it :p.It was a direct quote, not my misspelling if that's what you were hinting at! I managed to spell it correctly in the article title ;)
CSS Valid
Link