Gigabyte Goes Black: P67 Boards At IDF

"Gigabyte shows off a couple of their P67 motherboard designs at the Intel Developer Forum."

Search News

  • Scrolling Image
  • Scrolling Image
  • Scrolling Image
  • Scrolling Image
  • Scrolling Image

Over the past several years, Gigabyte has maintained a very recognizable, signature motherboard color-scheme: blue PCB with either white or other bright (sometimes eccentric) slots.  However, with their next crop of boards for Intel's Sandybridge, that's going to change.  

At the Intel Developer Forum (IDF) this past week, Gigabyte showed off two of their P67-based motherboards, the GA-P67A-UD7 and GA-P67A-UD5.  One of the first things you may notice is that both boards sport a clean, no-frills black and grey color scheme design, with one of the few distinguishing features being the stripe on the heatsink (gold for the UD7, blue for the UD5).

The more mainstream UD5 board features a dual-switching 20-phase power design, three PCIE x16 slots (though only two are full bandwidth 2.0), and a pair of SATA6Gbps and USB3.0 ports.  While the P67 chipset does incorporate native support for the SATA6Gbps ports, it is still lacking in the USB3.0 department, with those ports being powered by the usual NEC chip.

The UD7 will be at the top-end for this series (no UD9 monstrosity this time), making use of a dual-switching 24-phase power design and the NF200 chip for four full bandwidth PCIE x16 slots.  Like the UD5, the GA-P67A-UD7 sports the latest SATA6Gbps and USB3.0 ports, though this board gets twice the number of the latter.

While Gigabyte is unable to officially comment on the release date, one would imagine these will be going live with the LGA1155 launch at the beginning of next year.  Hopefully we'll be seeing reasonable pricing for these feature-packed boards.

Was this color change for the better or worse?  That's up to you to decide.  Be sure to vote and express your thoughts in the official poll on Gigabyte's forum here.

Discuss in our Forums

«Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments

30-08-2010, 05:32:50

tinytomlogan
Following the enormous success of their Megahalems CPU cooler, we take a look at the Prolimatech MK-13 VGA cooler.

Continue Reading

30-08-2010, 06:13:15

AlienALX


As if to make matters even more enjoyable, when we moved the card amongst our various motherboards attempting to find one that it would fit into without fouling the chipset heatsink, the RAM sinks fell off. We were really gentle too.



Which just so happens to be the same issue attatched to nigh on every third party GPU cooler on the market today.

And that causes fast death of a GPU. For what they charge for these things you would think that they would get that sorted out. I mean, surely some one some where in testing said "Oi, my ram sinks bloody fell off !".

Thanks again for a wonderfully honest review Mr VB. I shall avoid like the plague.

30-08-2010, 06:32:25

Ari-M.


Which just so happens to be the same issue attatched to nigh on every third party GPU cooler on the market today.

And that causes fast death of a GPU. For what they charge for these things you would think that they would get that sorted out. I mean, surely some one some where in testing said "Oi, my ram sinks bloody fell off !".

Thanks again for a wonderfully honest review Mr VB. I shall avoid like the plague.




Actually I have never had that issue with my Zalman stick on heat sinks. I am always sure to clean the chips with denatured first. The heat sinks on my gts250 have been in place through quite a few installs/system builds (gts250 is my test card) and less than gentle handling. Never had one fall off yet.

I have used the same Zalman stick on sinks on a variety of chips (sata controllers. etc etc etc) and have actually never had a single one fall off. I have probably used a few dozen of them over the course of the last year or so (building various systems and outfitting various cards/chips)

As long as you clean the surface you are sticking them to, they seem to work great.

I have certainly heard that others have bad luck with them though. Maybe it's the lack of prep. when putting them on? Or maybe I have just gotten lucky.


As for this VGA cooler in review....why would someone build a product that takes up 4 card slots? Was an intern somehow in charge of product design on this item? I just don't get it. They should have just designed the heatsink itself with an indentation in the middle...and then some clips to mount a fan.....same way as everyone else builds their coolers. Really an odd departure from a company that builds such well though out products.....

Seems like by the time you buy the product and then add 2 fans, you are far beyond the value of some of the cards this item is meant to cool, I mean could you imagine such a cooler on a card like a GTS250? You would have a $200 (US) plus GTS250.

For $20 more you could get a 460 or for about $60 more a pair of 5770's. Neither of which needs aftermarket cooling. *scratches head*

30-08-2010, 08:19:23

silenthill
when you install a third party VGA cooler you void your warranty and the company that makes the cooler doesn't give you a warranty so if anything goes wrong you have nowhere to turn too, doesn't that seem stupid or money just grows on trees these days for some people.

30-08-2010, 09:43:30

Ari-M.


when you install a third party VGA cooler you void your warranty and the company that makes the cooler doesn't give you a warranty so if anything goes wrong you have nowhere to turn too, doesn't that seem stupid or money just grows on trees these days for some people.








it makes sense if you have an older card, that you got super cheap. I personally did the upgrade to my gts250 because I couldn't stand the noise that the stock cooler put out....it basically ran 100% all the time, with no option to adjust fan speed (not even building a custom permission in RIVAtuner would allow fan control).....and I got the card for next to nothing. Same with the aftermarket cooler. I think I have less into the combo than the cheapest gts250 sells for on newegg.

So for system building and testing mobo/ram/cpu on builds it's a great solution....this way if I get a faulty PSU or mobo I dont' fry a valuable GPU while burning in other components. Also it's super quiet now and I don't have to hear it screaming on the test bench for a 48 hour burn-in


Would make much less sense if all the items were new, and you were paying MSRP. Then I have to agree with you, it's just silly.

30-08-2010, 09:57:34

hmmblah
Just about every card I have owned since a GeForce 2 Ti has had an aftermarket cooler. (Blorb on the GF2, remember those? lol) Not only do you get better cooling, but you can also clock higher and at lower noise levels than a stock cooler. I still have stock cooling on my GTX470 only because it is actually a good solution.

Worrying about a warranty is silly IMO. If you break the card changing the cooler it's your fault, but if the card happens to die a few months down the road from no fault of your own, just slap the stock cooler back on.

Back in the 9800 pro days, the stock cooling was well past inadequate and caused the cards to die prematurely. Overclocking was out of the question with stock cooling. Attaching an AC silencer (or a 1U copper server heatsink) was the only option.

I usually buy a new cooler WITH the brand new card. I only use stock cooling to test the new card and make sure it's not DOA, then the better third party cooling goes on.

30-08-2010, 10:39:17

AMDFTW
lol fail

03-02-2011, 13:36:20

Navu
It seems you have installed the L-shaped bracket i.e. the fans all wrong: there is a "huge" 2 cm gap between the fans and the outer surface of the MK-13 fins. This gap eliminates the airflow towards the cooler, having installed the L-shaped bracket the other way around and so the fans in direct touch to the cooler would have resulted to much better temps. I'm using the MK-13 to cool my XFX5870 using two rather weak 120mm fans (in "direct-touch mode") rotating at 650-700rpm, the result is I have never seen temps higher than 46 degrees for the GPU (that's 50 for memory and 52 for the VRMs using Thermalright VRM R4). At full throttle of about 1400rpm, CCC/Aida64 Extreme/GPU-Z indicate amazing 38-40 degrees!
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.