GELID Announce Silent Green WING Gamer Case Fan Series
"Silent Green WING Gamer Case Fan Series with Unique Bearing and Features"
Published: 11th August 2008 | Source: GELID |
The WING series (available in 8, 9 and 12cm) for gamers and modders features an unique Nanoflux bearing whose motor bearing is not only water - and dustproof but also allows the impeller to be removed for cleaning. The fan blades winglets were designed to achieve larger airflow, greater static pressure and are UV reactive. Even the slightest vibrations generated by the running fan will be absorbed by 4 Anti-vibration fan mounts which replace the traditional screws. A voltage regulator allows the user to adjust the fan speed between 5-12 Volts as desired.
WING 8 12.50 8.35
WING 9 13.50 9.00
WING 12 16.40 11.00
Most Recent Comments
Maybe we should look at it in the way that his religion teaches incest and murder, and that their "savior" spent an awful lot of time with a prostitute. Is it just me, or would that be a worse influence?
Alot of criminals do come from disadvantaged backgrounds but there are many kids from wealthy backgrounds who are screwed up on drugs, alcohol and the crimes associated with it. I come from a working class area and I know alot of my mates are strict with their kids because of the problems in our areas. I am strict with my two kids and my parents weren't wealthy but I was brought up to have respect and they did indeed discipline me. ;)To say that there is a clear divide between wealth and discipline is incorrect.
Just because someone comes from a single parent, or low income family doesn't make them a criminal or a social misfit. Criminals come from all walks of life and to label one segment of society is plain wrong in my opinion.
Cheers,
Stu
Agreed. Tbh OP has offended me a little, because I'm from a single parent family and my mother works freaking hard, yet I have never, and never will commit a crime.
Agreed. Tbh OP has offended me a little, because I'm from a single parent family and my mother works freaking hard, yet I have never, and never will commit a crime.
hey hey hey... i never said anything about single parent familiys, i was suggesting that a lack of support for the kids/familys, in my experience, seems to make kids more likely to go out and commit crimes... infact if you read my first post PROPERLY you'l see i'm focusing on the fact that children are either being underparented, or there is a bad role model in the family, aka "a brother who is a druggy", seriously i feel like im being made out into a rich snob here, the true focus of my post was about kids coming from "problem families", in which case they are incredibly likely to go and commit crimes, i have said nothign about the working class, nor insinuated them to be criminals, and i havnt even said anything about single mothers...
the only thing that was wrong about my first post was "but there is a clear divide of wealth and discipline", and that, i now see was insinuating that poorer people are more likely to become criminals, or that poorer parents discipline their children less, and i have already apolpgised for that unintended inference
Can't smoke at 16 Rast.... Where ya been mate?
Tis 18 now.
I thought that was just something supermarkets brought in off there own backs, nothing official.
hey hey hey... i never said anything about single parent familiys, i was suggesting that a lack of support for the kids/familys, in my experience, seems to make kids more likely to go out and commit crimes... infact if you read my first post PROPERLY you'l see i'm focusing on the fact that children are either being underparented, or there is a bad role model in the family, aka "a brother who is a druggy", seriously i feel like im being made out into a rich snob here, the true focus of my post was about kids coming from "problem families", in which case they are incredibly likely to go and commit crimes, i have said nothign about the working class, nor insinuated them to be criminals, and i havnt even said anything about single mothers...
the only thing that was wrong about my first post was "but there is a clear divide of wealth and discipline", and that, i now see was insinuating that poorer people are more likely to become criminals, or that poorer parents discipline their children less, and i have already apolpgised for that unintended inference
Okay Okay. I took what you said the wrong way.
Thats all I have to say.


